Re: message-beginning-of-line behaves a bit strange

[Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1365 bytes --]

>>> "EB" == Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> writes:

> Uwe Brauer wrote:
>>> Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:
>> 
>>> Try `message-beginning-of-header' instead. Alternately,
>>> fooling with the value of (variable)
>>> `message-beginning-of-line' while calling (function)
>>> `message-beginning-of-line'.
>> 
>> Great, I did
>> 
>> (defun my-add-subject-test ()
>> (interactive)
>> (message-goto-subject)
>> ;  (message-beginning-of-line)
>> (message-beginning-of-header 'subject)
>> (insert "[Test] "))
>> 
>> And this work nicely for both, empty and non empty
>> subject lines!

> ?! Subject twice?

> What kind of code is that? I mean

>   (message-goto-subject)
>   (message-beginning-of-header 'subject)

> Much better:

> `message-goto-subject' could have an optional formal parameter
> BEG so when the argument is non-nil it does
> (message-beginning-of-header 'subject) last.


That is a proposal?


> But at the very least (message-beginning-of-header 'subject)
> should imply (message-goto-subject) first.

> Or one could make HANDLE-FOLDED optional and when nil, go to
> the current line's header beginning.

> Subject should appear one time!

So the correct code is 

(defun my-add-subject-test ()
(interactive)
(message-goto-subject)
(message-beginning-of-header t)
(insert "[Test] "))

Ok!

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5673 bytes --]