From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 32125 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2020 11:02:57 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 8 Dec 2020 11:02:57 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kmalW-004FFL-5u for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 05:02:42 -0600 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kmalV-00G3RE-Lb for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 05:02:41 -0600 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kmalU-00G3R8-My for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 05:02:40 -0600 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kmalS-00AOWb-4g for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 05:02:40 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject: From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=oZE5HwJHUFh7bYGsJ9j9iAf+iU6cp1hbf4RdAJ7MP9A=; b=oC2jxmatUoFoU9Dmzhhvz9KzLl VUW4KuqjAf47K93x5qC41hkVhMmhNNukiE9MotPPzmpjD8XwyvcERWcwPd3Tqe3bteL21Cjk/IL9O a4zMhQPQoPJcJpnlc6awUhVHv/3fjWeYBQF38kWOG/tV4/6Plw4kTwjavaBHLh/K0hiU=; Received: from static.214.254.202.116.clients.your-server.de ([116.202.254.214] helo=ciao.gmane.io) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmalI-00014o-RR for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 12:02:33 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmalI-000AQb-3Y for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 12:02:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: ding@gnus.org From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: gnus doesn't honor mode-line-buffer-id Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 11:02:22 +0000 Organization: On the Interweb somewhere Message-ID: <871rg0mugx.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <877dpsadwh.fsf@yandex.com> <87k0tsmyvv.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87y2i88tj7.fsf@yandex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:vDMqggGzp/OXHdHt+Ne5Np7UZmM= X-Url: http://twitter.com/ericsfraga/ List-ID: Precedence: bulk On Tuesday, 8 Dec 2020 at 10:46, Colin Baxter wrote: > Do you think it's a bug? Deep philosophical question that only Lars can answer. ;-) IMO, it does seem wrong if all other modes behave consistently but gnus does not. -- Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50 & org 9.4 on Debian bullseye/sid