From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87940 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Newsgroup colours?!? Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:57:45 +0200 Message-ID: <871sfl3712.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <87fu9o1q5p.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87r2t8qvbw.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1523472989 22043 195.159.176.226 (11 Apr 2018 18:56:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 18:56:29 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: ding-owner+m36154@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Apr 11 20:56:25 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from mxfilter-048034.atla03.us.yomura.com ([107.189.48.34]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f6Kuv-0005Yw-IU for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:56:25 +0200 X-Yomura-MXScrub: 1.0 Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu (unknown [129.7.128.208]) by mxfilter-048034.atla03.us.yomura.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 4d0d6694-3dba-11e8-950a-b499baa2b07a; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 18:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f6KwR-00050K-Kp; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:57:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f6KwP-0004zm-Ew for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:57:57 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f6KwN-0000jb-ST for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:57:57 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1f6KwM-0000v1-Hf for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:57:54 +0200 Original-Received: from 46.67.12.60.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.67.12.60] helo=corrigan) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f6KwK-0007f7-37; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:57:54 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by corrigan with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f6KwE-0002Ei-Aa; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 20:57:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r2t8qvbw.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Wed, 08 Nov 2017 14:06:27 -0800") X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "hermes.netfonds.no", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > I also had an "AAUGGGHH!!" moment a few days ago, but have since > retreated to grudging acceptance. This was done in 16784a5f6. > > Probably the idea should have been floated here first, but no great harm > done. At the very least, it's made me aware of the relevant faces. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 PLING_QUERY Subject has exclamation mark and question mark X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.1 2015-04-28) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.4993 Ham tokens: 0.000-65--2440h-0s--0d--H*r:sk:ECDHE_R, 0.000-16--600h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-16--594h-0s--0d--H*MI:fsf, 0.000-13--459h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-13--456h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs Spam tokens: 0.997-75--1h-60s--0d--H*F:D*gnus.org, 0.997-18289--349h-14893s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-internal:sk:junkmas, 0.997-18289--349h-14893s--0d--H*RT:sk:junkmas, 0.997-18289--349h-14893s--0d--HX-Envelope-From:sk:junkmas, 0.995-25686--762h-21134s--0d--H*Ad:D*gnus.org Autolearn status: no autolearn_force=no -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.91.224.195 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4993] 1.0 PLING_QUERY Subject has exclamation mark and question mark List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87940 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > I also had an "AAUGGGHH!!" moment a few days ago, but have since > retreated to grudging acceptance. This was done in 16784a5f6. > > Probably the idea should have been floated here first, but no great harm > done. At the very least, it's made me aware of the relevant faces. I think the colours should be reverted back to what they were before the change. Normal text should be white on black (if you have a dark background), and colours should be used to emphasise or de-emphasise certain text. Following that principle, normal Gnus groups should be white, not ... er... what are they now? Teal? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no