From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/83181 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: XEmacs builds failing - gnus-spec.el Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 09:39:08 +0200 Message-ID: <871u92yuar.fsf@randomsample.de> References: <87a9nqu62k.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <5277.1368999929@rawbw.com> <8761yetyx5.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87sj1isjmw.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87li7asg2y.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369035674 8439 80.91.229.3 (20 May 2013 07:41:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 07:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren?=) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M31447@lists.math.uh.edu Mon May 20 09:41:13 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UeKiX-0002XV-8C for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 09:41:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1UeKgs-00041f-Er; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:39:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1UeKgp-00041T-Ap for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:39:27 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UeKgj-00081o-3l for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 20 May 2013 02:39:26 -0500 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([83.169.19.17]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UeKgh-00011Y-8k for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 09:39:19 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=bMAAVXtVr45jalmEefsASImoPtqNYPUt49tyAppbD24=; b=AYtaiATowFJVD3ufxBVEbMQBo5zYRga++uM/Z/J+Hp+5JY+iHqAQhoPpooFKrOdrQKYZvUlJcuVnOQcXiyJXgwRG2tDXglqwgRcCRU2OQWNxFpM40DIs10fxuy3/U2xi; Original-Received: from dslc-082-083-053-106.pools.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.53.106] helo=spaten) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UeKgd-0000O6-6X; Mon, 20 May 2013 09:39:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87li7asg2y.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> ("Adam \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?Sj\?\= \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?\=F8gren\=22's\?\= message of "Mon, 20 May 2013 01:30:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never Mail-Followup-To: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren?=), ding@gnus.org X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:83181 Archived-At: Adam Sj=F8gren writes: > asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sj=F8gren) writes: > >> I wonder if simply changing that to (=3D delim ?\u00AB)) would do the >> trick. > > That made the 21.5 buildbot go green: > > * http://www.randomsample.de:4456/waterfall > > Cool! Thanks for fixing this. The XEmacs on the Buildbot is indeed build with default specs, i.e., without Mule. > Now the 21.4 fails somewhere after yenc.el instead of on gnus-spec.el, > so that's progress as well: > > * http://www.randomsample.de:4456/builders/xemacs21.4-linux/builds/963/s= teps/compile/logs/stdio No, it fails before with While compiling gnus-parse-complex-format in file /var/lib/buildbot/slaves/= debian/build-xemacs21.4/build/lisp/gnus-spec.el: !! error (("reference to free variable 00AB")) XEmacs 21.4 behaves strangely with the Buildbot. If there is an error, it stalls at the end until the Buildbot kills the process; yenc.el is simply the last file that is compiled. It works fine on the command line, so I've no idea why it does not work when called from the Buildbot. -David