From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/82841 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric S Fraga Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Agent in batch mode for imap Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:12:41 +1030 Message-ID: <871udmdkla.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <87623dfh85.fsf@free.fr> <87r4m1j9ii.fsf@free.fr> <877gnshm9e.fsf@gmail.com> <877gng5bry.fsf@free.fr> <87k3rfpgcq.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87vcay14so.fsf@free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358296935 4214 80.91.229.3 (16 Jan 2013 00:42:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:42:15 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: ding-owner+M31107=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Jan 16 01:42:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TvH5J-0000qg-IA for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:42:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1TvH52-0000xT-JM for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:42:12 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1TvH51-0000xN-8n for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:42:11 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TvH4z-0007Ju-SE for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:42:11 -0600 Original-Received: from co9ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com ([207.46.163.26] helo=co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvH4w-000833-63 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:42:06 +0100 Original-Received: from mail194-co9-R.bigfish.com (10.236.132.243) by CO9EHSOBE040.bigfish.com (10.236.130.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:41:58 +0000 Original-Received: from mail194-co9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail194-co9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0DA1C024C for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:41:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.250.229;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:AMSPRD0111HT004.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: 0 X-BigFish: PS0(zzbb2dIc89bhzz1ee6h1de0h1d18h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzzz2dh2a8h668h839h8e2h8e3h93fhd24he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h16a6h1758hbe9i1155h) Original-Received: from mail194-co9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail194-co9 (MessageSwitch) id 1358296917402107_28807; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:41:57 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from CO9EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (unknown [10.236.132.231]) by mail194-co9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5665E38004B for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:41:57 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from AMSPRD0111HT004.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (157.56.250.229) by CO9EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (10.236.130.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:41:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost (202.158.216.33) by pod51002.outlook.com (10.242.75.165) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.245.2; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:41:52 +0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87vcay14so.fsf@free.fr> (Julien Cubizolles's message of "Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:04:39 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Originating-IP: [202.158.216.33] X-UCLLIVE-SCLRULE: HASRUN X-OriginatorOrg: ucl.ac.uk X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:82841 Archived-At: Julien Cubizolles writes: > I guess the agent confuses itself when it splits a message to=20 > the same group it splitted it from and counts it twice. Looks=20 > like a bug=C2=A0?=20 Whether it's a bug or not, it is rather inefficient as you will be=20 processing any such messages over and over again! Seems cleaner=20 to split to elsewhere regardless. --=20 : Eric S Fraga, GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D : in Emacs 24.3.50.1 + Ma Gnus v0.6 : BBDB version 3.02 ($Date: 2013/01/13 22:41:36 $)