From: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren)
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: Gnus bugfixing is broken.
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:12:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871v29d6kh.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hbb5ivdo.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:17:55 +0100, David wrote:
> So the only visible reaction I get after about a week is a chastisement
> for thinking something in the bug reporting process appears to be
> broken.
> To be honest, I am not exactly convinced otherwise yet.
Try looking at it from the other side: You have reported a bug which has
not been fixed within a week, and from that you go directly to declaring
that bugfixing in Gnus in general is broken.
Aren't you taking overgeneralization to a new extreme here?
Best regards,
Adam
--
"Money always takes the place of life" Adam Sjøgren
asjo@koldfront.dk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-14 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-14 10:11 David Kastrup
2011-03-14 14:47 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-14 15:17 ` David Kastrup
2011-03-14 16:12 ` Adam Sjøgren [this message]
2011-03-14 17:47 ` Sivaram Neelakantan
2011-03-14 16:22 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-14 19:13 ` message-yank-original issue (was: Gnus bugfixing is broken.) Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-14 19:38 ` message-yank-original issue Antoine Levitt
2011-03-14 19:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-14 21:02 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-03-14 22:04 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-15 0:36 ` Michael Welsh Duggan
2011-03-15 15:30 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-15 15:29 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-15 15:49 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-15 15:56 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-15 9:34 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-15 9:48 ` David Kastrup
2011-03-15 10:01 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-26 19:34 ` Sven Joachim
2011-03-28 19:05 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-28 19:57 ` Sven Joachim
2011-03-28 20:06 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-28 20:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-03-29 5:37 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-03-28 20:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-03-29 14:55 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-29 15:08 ` David Kastrup
2011-03-29 15:20 ` Gnus compatibility with the lexical binding branch (was: message-yank-original issue) Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-29 20:16 ` Gnus compatibility with the lexical binding branch Stefan Monnier
2011-03-29 20:53 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-30 0:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-04-08 5:51 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-15 10:06 ` Gnus bugfixing is broken Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-15 13:31 ` Didier Verna
2011-03-15 13:52 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-15 15:23 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-15 15:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-15 16:09 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-15 17:01 ` Didier Verna
2011-03-15 13:58 ` Michael Albinus
2011-03-15 14:46 ` Didier Verna
2011-03-15 14:57 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-15 15:08 ` Michael Albinus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871v29d6kh.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk \
--to=asjo@koldfront.dk \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).