From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/77688 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam =?utf-8?Q?Sj=C3=B8gren?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus bugfixing is broken. Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:12:46 +0100 Organization: koldfront - analysis & revolution, Copenhagen, Denmark Message-ID: <871v29d6kh.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> References: <871v2ako4c.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87hbb5ivdo.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300119246 2227 80.91.229.12 (14 Mar 2011 16:14:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:14:06 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M26012@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Mar 14 17:14:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzAP8-0002wC-55 for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:13:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PzAOF-0004ob-PY; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PzAOE-0004oK-9V for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PzAOC-00080p-N9 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:13:01 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PzAOA-0007yc-11 for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:12:58 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PzAO9-0002UW-Ev for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:12:57 +0100 Original-Received: from rain.gmane.org ([80.91.229.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:12:57 +0100 Original-Received: from asjo by rain.gmane.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:12:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: rain.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: )qY&CseJ?.:=8F#^~GcSA?F=9eu'{KAFfL1C3/A&:nE?PW\i65"ba0NS)97,Q(^@xk}n4Ou rPuR#V8I(J_@~H($[ym:`K_+]*kjvW>xH5jbgLBVFGXY:(#4P>zVBklLbdL&XxL\M)%T}3S/IS9lMJ ^St'=VZBR Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:77688 Archived-At: On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:17:55 +0100, David wrote: > So the only visible reaction I get after about a week is a chastisement > for thinking something in the bug reporting process appears to be > broken. > To be honest, I am not exactly convinced otherwise yet. Try looking at it from the other side: You have reported a bug which has not been fixed within a week, and from that you go directly to declaring that bugfixing in Gnus in general is broken. Aren't you taking overgeneralization to a new extreme here? Best regards, Adam -- "Money always takes the place of life" Adam Sjøgren asjo@koldfront.dk