From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76817 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Welsh Duggan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Incoming IMAP split problem Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:23:02 -0500 Message-ID: <871v38c5jt.fsf@maru.md5i.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297873404 23766 80.91.229.12 (16 Feb 2011 16:23:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:23:24 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M25156@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Feb 16 17:23:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppk9w-000279-NG for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:23:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppk9p-00080w-Tl; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:23:14 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppk9o-00080d-4m for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:23:12 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppk9m-0005a2-Ve for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:23:12 -0600 Original-Received: from md5i.com ([75.151.244.229] helo=maru.md5i.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppk9l-0004UC-QI for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:23:09 +0100 Original-Received: from md5i by maru.md5i.com with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppk9e-0003uO-5g for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:23:02 -0500 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76817 Archived-At: Here's a portion of an IMAP split log that looks fishy: 11:18:36 882 SELECT "INBOX" 11:18:36 883 UID FETCH 1:* FLAGS 11:18:36 884 UID FETCH 25439:25440 (UID BODY.PEEK[HEADER] BODY.PEEK[1]) 11:18:36 885 UID COPY 25440 "INBOX/sei" 11:18:36 886 UID STORE 25439 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) 11:18:36 887 EXPUNGE Why is it copying 25440 (correctly), and then deleting 25439 (which I didn't see)? Am I losing mail? -- Michael Welsh Duggan (md5i@md5i.com)