From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/62529 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: moved messages don't go away neither Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:28:46 +0200 Message-ID: <871wwcdm0x.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87wte5mqzw.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> <86vetox1lo.fsf@student.uni-magdeburg.de> <87k6a4qn0c.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <867j64nkte.fsf@student.uni-magdeburg.de> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144254665 310 80.91.229.2 (5 Apr 2006 16:31:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+m11056@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Apr 05 18:30:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRAtz-0005DX-PB for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:30:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FRAtt-0005iD-00; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:30:33 -0500 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FRAtU-0005i8-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:30:08 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FRAtR-0006Y0-II for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:30:08 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1FRAtP-0006fm-00 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:30:03 +0200 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FRAst-0004u8-OL for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:29:32 +0200 Original-Received: from maportatil10.quim.ucm.es ([147.96.7.218]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:29:31 +0200 Original-Received: from oub by maportatil10.quim.ucm.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:29:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 44 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: maportatil10.quim.ucm.es X-Hashcash: 1:20:060405:gmane.emacs.gnus.general::ZJieY1A6kVQDEX72:00000000000000000000000000000000000005WS4 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4.18 (linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ugasZdBRKBqrTK6KHwoff8tV3rU= X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:62529 Archived-At: >>>>> "Wolfram" == Wolfram Fenske >>>>> writes: Wolfram> Uwe Brauer writes: Wolfram> Did you recompile "nnimap.el" or move the old "nnimap.elc" Wolfram> out of the way? IIRC, Emacs tries to use the compiled Wolfram> version of a file, even if it's older. Of course I did. Wolfram> Also, how exactly are you're articles still there? I ask, because Wolfram> there are two problems: Wolfram> 1. Articles that appears in an nnimap group but aren't Wolfram> really there. When you try to read such an article, Gnus Wolfram> beeps at you and tells you the article is no longer Wolfram> present (something like that). IIRC, you can't delete Wolfram> (B DEL) it, either. This is what I referred to as Wolfram> "ghost mail" in my previous post, and this is what I Wolfram> believe the original poster was talking about. I may be Wolfram> wrong, though. No this is not my case. I can read the article. Wolfram> 2. Moving articles in the nnimap backend didn't work Wolfram> because the article in the source folder was not Wolfram> expired. But in contrast to problem no. 1, the article Wolfram> in the source folder could still be read. My patch Wolfram> should have fixed this bug. But the article has been copied? If so then it is my case. I use the gnus-summary-move-article function, say in a imap folder INBOX, then the articles *gets* copied to the new imap folder, say IMPORTANT, and the article is then *marked* as deleted. However when I reenter the group INBOX, the article is still there. Uwe