At 2003-02-07T12:25:05Z, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Wes Hardaker writes: >> Yeah, xpms suck for compression. I think the reason for using them in >> gnus is that they're supported by more Emacs versions than pngs are. > And they have symbolic color names, which means that it's easy to > change the colors when you display the images. The main point of my xpm-png comparison was for purposes of posting sample images to a widely-disseminated mailing list. I imagine that n users times i bytes could be equal to a large number. I would not recommend png over xpm for the actual task of installing the images in Gnus. -- Kirk Strauser In Googlis non est, ergo non est.