From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49904 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kirk Strauser Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: better gnus logos Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 12:00:50 -0600 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <871y2k7yy5.fsf@strauser.com> References: <87fzr72a8d.fsf@strauser.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044640792 17231 80.91.224.249 (7 Feb 2003 17:59:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 17:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18hCn0-0004Ti-00 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 18:59:51 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18hCoJ-00018l-00; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 12:01:11 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 07 Feb 2003 12:02:08 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA22491 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:01:58 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from pooh.strauser.com (kirk@pooh.honeypot.net [10.0.5.128]) by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h17I0u3v067825 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:00:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Original-To: ding@hpc.uh.edu In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:25:05 +0100") Original-Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49904 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49904 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-02-07T12:25:05Z, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Wes Hardaker writes: >> Yeah, xpms suck for compression. I think the reason for using them in >> gnus is that they're supported by more Emacs versions than pngs are. > And they have symbolic color names, which means that it's easy to > change the colors when you display the images. The main point of my xpm-png comparison was for purposes of posting sample images to a widely-disseminated mailing list. I imagine that n users times i bytes could be equal to a large number. I would not recommend png over xpm for the actual task of installing the images in Gnus. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser In Googlis non est, ergo non est. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+Q/RY5sRg+Y0CpvERAvkVAJ94LP5A9AqSmFFy0zPUKB9HSpuziwCcDbg8 9vZDaD2G3tjBvRJ9Iu3BMMY= =30kp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--