From: Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>
Subject: Re: Time for partial download of nnimap messages again?
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:48:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871ya0yx7y.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vafznwozv4h.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
>>>>> Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann):
> What about generality? Your suggestion works for nnimap, but WIBNI
> there was a scheme that could be made to work generally? Something
> like an augmented backend interface. Some backends could support a
> function to retrieve the MIME structure of a message. (Like a TOC,
> also similar to what C-d does on a message. But a datastructure.)
Btw the C-d result is a good fit to what you get from IMAP.
> Then additional functions should be added to retrieve certain parts
> of a message.
> Then Gnus would look whether the backend supports the new functions.
> If so, it would ask for the TOC and retrieve all text/* (or whatever)
> parts, or all small parts, or all inline parts, or something, and
> replaces the other ones with a button.
> Would this be more difficult to do?
I don't know. My initial proposal should be possible to do with a
handler for the MIME type message/external-body, and changes to the
nnimap backend. What do the lisp gurus say? What's the preferred
approach?
There seems to be quite a bit of conservativism wrt. changing the
backend interface.
_If_ there is to be a backend change I would like it to go hand in
hand with other changes, like making the backend interface
asynchronous.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-19 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-18 18:55 Steinar Bang
2002-07-18 19:36 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-07-18 21:47 ` Steinar Bang
2002-07-19 7:25 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-07-19 7:34 ` Steinar Bang
2002-07-19 8:11 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-07-19 7:48 ` Steinar Bang [this message]
2002-07-19 8:13 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-07-19 10:56 ` Steinar Bang
2002-07-26 19:59 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-07-27 9:47 ` Steinar Bang
2002-07-27 14:09 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-07-29 23:10 ` Wes Hardaker
2002-07-26 19:55 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-07-26 19:51 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-07-27 9:42 ` Steinar Bang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871ya0yx7y.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no \
--to=sb@dod.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).