From: Josh Huber <huber@alum.wpi.edu>
Subject: Re: Automagic content recognition - good or bad?
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:33:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871yab64am.fsf@alum.wpi.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hvit3n7ngv.fsf@rasputin.ws.nextra.no>
Bjørn Mork <bmork@dod.no> writes:
> Thanks. I already found mm-uu-configure-list which did what I
> wanted.
>
> But my question is really whether the default makes any sense?
> Having such features is great; turning them on by default is...well,
> not as great. IMHO.
I agree, having Gnus (by default) turn a snippit of shell code into an
attachment seems pretty bogus to me.
--
Josh Huber
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-10 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-10 11:48 Bjørn Mork
2002-07-10 12:41 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-07-10 12:54 ` Bjørn Mork
2002-07-10 14:33 ` Josh Huber [this message]
2002-07-10 16:18 ` Frank Schmitt
2002-12-30 19:11 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-12-30 19:26 ` Karl Eichwalder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871yab64am.fsf@alum.wpi.edu \
--to=huber@alum.wpi.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).