From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37592 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus asks where to save MIME part, instead of displaying message Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 02:07:17 +0200 Message-ID: <871ymn8le2.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <87ofprshct.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172978 14636 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:02:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 22407 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2001 23:59:44 -0000 Original-Received: from mail.s.netic.de (HELO mail.netic.de) (212.9.160.11) by gnus.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2001 23:59:44 -0000 Original-Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services via remoteip 212.9.163.25 via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp for mail.gnus.org id m15UGlB-001X1FC; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 01:59:41 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de ident=exim) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15UGa7-00012T-00 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2001 01:48:15 +0200 Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15UGsX-0000Ng-00 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2001 02:07:17 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Laura Conrad's message of "Tue, 07 Aug 2001 17:27:08 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 10 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37592 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37592 Laura Conrad writes: > Here it is. I notice that it's still trying to read a bogus group > that I tried to read yesterday. So I tried opening the message in a > gnus in a different emacs, and it works for me there, too. So I don't > know whether this is a gnus bug or a gnus manifestation of an emacs > bug. It looks like your mailcap/MIME/whatever configuration in the original Emacs is messed up. Strange.