From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36286 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Huber Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: more on accessing the body via split rules... Date: 21 May 2001 10:08:59 -0400 Organization: Mind your own business, you silly arthur king! Message-ID: <871ypi7q10.fsf@mclinux.com> References: <87r8xmg02v.fsf@mclinux.com> <87d796d5xw.fsf@mclinux.com> <878zjud3cs.fsf@mclinux.com> <87wv7e7acu.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171897 7758 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:44:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:44:57 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 9903 invoked by alias); 21 May 2001 14:09:11 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 9898 invoked from network); 21 May 2001 14:09:07 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (195.204.10.139) by gnus.org with SMTP; 21 May 2001 14:09:07 -0000 Original-Received: (from news@localhost) by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA32165 for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 20 May 2001 16:08:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: lowell.missioncriticallinux.com Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 990367732 4797 208.51.139.16 (20 May 2001 14:08:52 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 May 2001 14:08:52 GMT X-Go-Away: or I shall taunt you a second time! X-PGP-KeyID: 6B21489A X-PGP-CertKey: 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A X-Request-PGP: finger:huber@db.debian.org Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) Original-Lines: 24 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36286 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36286 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes: > On 19 May 2001, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > > Hm, how is this a problem? Doesn't nnmail copy the article into > > nnmail-incoming-buffer before processing it, even when respooling? > > If this would happen, that would be good enough, I guess. Then, split > rules wishing to access the message body can look in > nnmail-incoming-buffer. > > Josh? It doesn't happen. I put a (debug) inside my fancy split function, and checked out the values of the variables and what buffers existed. gnus-original-article-buffer definitely points to < *Original Article*> and said buffer contains the message being re-spooled. Should it copy the message into nnmail-incoming-buffer beforehand? thanks for checking this out, :) -- Josh Huber