From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86843 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus cleanup Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 12:26:16 +0800 Message-ID: <8737sx6xsn.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87h9hied21.fsf@gnus.org> <87fuwyy302.fsf@gnus.org> <877fi9qsmh.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <8737sxcn92.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87oablff72.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455337655 11248 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2016 04:27:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 04:27:35 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M35066@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Feb 13 05:27:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aURnm-0001gj-KQ for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 05:27:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aURn5-0005pC-Mc; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 22:26:39 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aURn2-0005oX-6y for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 22:26:36 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aURmy-0006I8-6s for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 22:26:36 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aURmw-00017M-60 for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 05:26:30 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aURmo-00011B-F3 for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 05:26:22 +0100 Original-Received: from 116.1.70.96 ([116.1.70.96]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 05:26:22 +0100 Original-Received: from eric by 116.1.70.96 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 05:26:22 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 116.1.70.96 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SC65pIvTYpToYc0G+h+0qROvVuA= X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86843 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Scratch that, the problem is that bum commit 9dc77e went into both >> master and emacs-25, but the reversion only went into emacs-25. I've >> switched to emacs-25, and everything's normal. > > I've now reverted it on master, too. Could you check whether it works > for you now? All seems well, on both branches. >> I know this debate is still ongoing, but is there any consensus here >> about whether we should be using master or emacs-25? > > master should be getting all fixes that emacs-25 is getting, too, but > (as in this case) there may be some lag. On the other hand, master gets > all the new stuff. So it's up to you. :-) If master's where the party's at, that's what I'll run. :) Great to see all this happening! Eric