From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/83617 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jidanni@jidanni.org Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Buffer called *sent wide reply to TG * but he was not one of the recipients Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:56:25 +0800 Message-ID: <8738qsfrva.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1375430290 15134 80.91.229.3 (2 Aug 2013 07:58:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 07:58:10 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M31873@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Aug 02 09:58:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V5AFX-0001jC-Mp for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:58:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1V5AE5-0007NQ-9V; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 02:56:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1V5AE2-0007ND-Js for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 02:56:38 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1V5AE1-0006oU-5n for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 02:56:38 -0500 Original-Received: from caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.83] helo=homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1V5ADy-000257-US for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:56:35 +0200 Original-Received: from homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847E263406E for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 00:56:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= jidanni.org; bh=SS3K8b6RXo6EDDsF6GCpNH5ocT8=; b=NFOsQTZw0kFuz9u5 7/0Z5LEkVYfFJRdVy0WgibPKMFJ93u6NfuUfLNHki7KD4OJvNMXdJGFDRLoo2g/M xJH+SrX3ZktrhRvIVj+Zo0ZyX7fszxeA7PHOBePLqoqBWQwbr6O3m05eTshGy7uY XReJIo5iQp+qrvQ0d5+wYqpNvng= Original-Received: from jidanni.org (122-118-148-166.dynamic.hinet.net [122.118.148.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a62.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66C8463406C for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 00:56:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.4928 Ham tokens: 0.000-25--180h-0s--0d--H*RU:sk:homiema, 0.000-25--180h-0s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:sk:homiema, 0.000-24--177h-0s--0d--H*r:sk:homiema, 0.000-1863--13911h-3s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-7--52h-0s--0d--Gnus Spam tokens: 0.993-1--0h-2s--2d--H*r:sk:122-118, 0.993-1--0h-2s--2d--H*RU:sk:122-118, 0.993-1--0h-2s--2d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:sk:122-118, 0.992-11208--540h-47539s--0d--H*Ad:D*gnus.org, 0.991-6466--351h-27586s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org Autolearn status: ham -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [208.97.132.83 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4928] -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:83617 Archived-At: Type S W (runs the command gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original,) Now alter the headers so the guy listed in the buffer name is no longer one of the recipients. Now send the message. Well that buffer name is now changed to be called *sent wide reply to TG * But in fact he was not one of recipients! I mean if you are going to change the buffer name, might as well change it to one of the recipients! gnus-version "Gnus v5.13"