* Buffer called *sent wide reply to TG <x@example.com>* but he was not one of the recipients @ 2013-08-02 7:56 jidanni 2013-08-02 12:44 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen 2013-08-03 3:28 ` Eric Abrahamsen 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: jidanni @ 2013-08-02 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ding Type S W (runs the command gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original,) Now alter the headers so the guy listed in the buffer name is no longer one of the recipients. Now send the message. Well that buffer name is now changed to be called *sent wide reply to TG <thatguy@example.com>* But in fact he was not one of recipients! I mean if you are going to change the buffer name, might as well change it to one of the recipients! gnus-version "Gnus v5.13" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Buffer called *sent wide reply to TG <x@example.com>* but he was not one of the recipients 2013-08-02 7:56 Buffer called *sent wide reply to TG <x@example.com>* but he was not one of the recipients jidanni @ 2013-08-02 12:44 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen 2013-08-03 3:28 ` Eric Abrahamsen 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2013-08-02 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ding jidanni@jidanni.org writes: > Well that buffer name is now changed to be called > *sent wide reply to TG <thatguy@example.com>* It just changes the "unsent" to "sent". -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) No Gnus T-Shirt for sale: http://ingebrigtsen.no/no.php ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Buffer called *sent wide reply to TG <x@example.com>* but he was not one of the recipients 2013-08-02 7:56 Buffer called *sent wide reply to TG <x@example.com>* but he was not one of the recipients jidanni 2013-08-02 12:44 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2013-08-03 3:28 ` Eric Abrahamsen 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Eric Abrahamsen @ 2013-08-03 3:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ding jidanni@jidanni.org writes: > Type S W (runs the command > gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original,) > > Now alter the headers so the guy listed in the buffer name is no longer > one of the recipients. > > Now send the message. > > Well that buffer name is now changed to be called > *sent wide reply to TG <thatguy@example.com>* > > But in fact he was not one of recipients! > > I mean if you are going to change the buffer name, might as well change > it to one of the recipients! > > gnus-version "Gnus v5.13" Looks like you could get the behavior you want by taking `message-default-send-rename-function', removing the if statement (just leave the "else" part), giving that function a new name, and setting `message-send-rename-function' to the name of your new function. Totally untested! E ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-08-03 3:28 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-08-02 7:56 Buffer called *sent wide reply to TG <x@example.com>* but he was not one of the recipients jidanni 2013-08-02 12:44 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen 2013-08-03 3:28 ` Eric Abrahamsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).