From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80377 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Harry Putnam Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Still no workee with gmail and Imap Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:50:07 -0500 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: <8739enmzm8.fsf@newsguy.com> References: <87hb3494jx.fsf@newsguy.com> <87mxcw92p8.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <8739eoz8oe.fsf@newsguy.com> <87pqhrviut.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319125886 15225 80.91.229.12 (20 Oct 2011 15:51:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:51:26 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M28665@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Oct 20 17:51:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGutt-0000IV-Cy for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:51:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RGutH-0003YZ-HE; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:50:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RGutF-0003YO-QW for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:50:41 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RGutC-0004TB-Po for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:50:41 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RGut9-0005aK-FK for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:50:35 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGut9-0008FH-5y for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:50:35 +0200 Original-Received: from c-98-215-179-64.hsd1.in.comcast.net ([98.215.179.64]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:50:35 +0200 Original-Received: from reader by c-98-215-179-64.hsd1.in.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:50:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 45 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-215-179-64.hsd1.in.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:YS5OKh+mUR4zJjne3MVAME6+vZo= X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80377 Archived-At: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:41:21 -0500, Harry wrote: > >>>> How can I debug this? > >>> $ ssh google.com >>> $ cd /usr/src/gmail >>> $ vi srv/imap.c > >> Are you joking here.... should I be able to ssh to my user on google? >> I'm gullible so be kind. > > I was trying to suggest that it might be a server side problem, but > maybe the way was a little too contrived :-) > > Maybe you could try a minimal configuration (perhaps create a test-user > for the purpose) and see if you get the same problems with that? I just finished setting that up: New user on linux machine new user on gmail and it works as expected. So something in my regular user setup is messing up the imap part. I actually used the same .gnus file in the above mentioned new setup, just editing names and mail locations. With the new test setup, mail sent to gmail shows up on gnus just as soon as it does on gmail... seems to be no lag at all. I've compared the new users settings on gmail (all default) to the old user settings and they compare line for line. So its apparently not ~/.gnus or gmail settings that is the problem. Still fishing around so it appears it might take a while... I'm really kind of lost as to what to be looking at or for. I guess .emacs would be the next probability since the new test user used no .emacs at all.