From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78356 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:55:07 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <8739lw60sk.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87hbahww99.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8762qxo4l3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lizs9w5e.fsf@randomsample.de> <87sjtzznil.fsf@randomsample.de> <8762qub9q5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87tyeeyqrx.fsf@randomsample.de> <87oc4k66at.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lizomz5s.fsf@randomsample.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302026422 25225 80.91.229.12 (5 Apr 2011 18:00:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:00:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 05 20:00:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7AY4-0005e4-AM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:00:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49288 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7ATU-0007kp-67 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:55:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57212 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7ATO-0007jx-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:55:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7ATM-0008NF-0H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:55:25 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46268) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7ATL-0008Mw-Ow for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:55:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7ATJ-0002gl-1y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:55:21 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:55:21 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:55:21 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dCGr+Gy6+aiWfRJd0k/m7BOGEuE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138187 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78356 Archived-At: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:38:23 +0200 David Engster wrote: DE> I saw that you now set every slot value in the :after method. This isn't DE> necessary; :initform is absolutely save to use for symbols. The only DE> thing that changed in EIEIO is for the case where :initform is a DE> function which has to be evaluated, which is only working correctly in DE> newer versions. I thought it was more consistent to set all the slot values in one place. It is more verbose though... I'm 50-50 on it, do you see any issues with the method other than being more verbose? Ted