From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/77852 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: can Gnus simply use the Emacs bug tracker? Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:44:05 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <8739mmvrbe.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <8762rk2vah.fsf@lifelogs.com> <6iy64gxk4z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87lj0gyxld.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877hbzxj11.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300301082 15197 80.91.229.12 (16 Mar 2011 18:44:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:44:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 16 19:44:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pzvhz-00088R-6s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:44:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35446 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pzvhy-00080k-P8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:44:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35021 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pzvhp-0007sl-Kz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:44:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pzvhl-0008Nv-7g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:44:25 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:49817) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pzvhk-0008NU-UK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:44:21 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pzvhh-00081C-VD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:44:17 +0100 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:44:17 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:44:17 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110014 (No Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:czYghPJVLVLz/N2P9UfgHmiX8eE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137306 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:77852 Archived-At: On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:32:14 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Or perhaps we could just remove `M-x gnus-bug' from the version in the LMI> trunk, and tell people to report the bugs the normal way? LMI> Alternatively, define `M-x gnus-bug' as an alias to `M-x LMI> report-emacs-bugs'. Perhaps with the extra package thing? I think the second way is better, yes, so we can customize `gnus-bug' as needed. On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:55:33 -0400 Glenn Morris wrote: GM> Glenn Morris wrote (on Wed, 16 Mar 2011 at 13:51 -0400): >> Yes, I suggest you make M-x gnus-bug always send mail to bug-gnu-emacs. >> The only difference should be that in standalone Gnus, you add a line >> "Package: gnus" at the start of the body, whereas in Emacs you add >> "Package: emacs,gnus". GM> The only difficulty is you need to document that bug reports will end GM> up at different addresses based on the package line. Maybe it's better GM> to send the mail to submit@debbugs rather than bug-gnu-emacs. It GM> doesn't affect how anything works, but it might make people a bit less GM> likely to say "why isn't my report showing up on bug-gnu-emacs?" So M-x gnus-bug will: 1) send to submit@debbugs, and 2) set the Package to either "gnus" in a Gnus checkout, or "emacs,gnus" in a trunk checkout. No mail server reconfiguration will be necessary. Ted