From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74443
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Dan Christensen <jdc@uwo.ca>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: gnutls status
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:33:22 -0500
Message-ID: <8739qmd63h.fsf@uwo.ca>
References: <sa3vd3l2txq.fsf@cigue.easter-eggs.fr>
	<m3eia9nd1d.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <87ipzkmgfn.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<m3bp5cdvkw.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <m3hbf2eto7.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<m3mxoultj2.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <m31v667ph5.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<m3pqtqg3c9.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <87vd3ibu3i.fsf@dod.no>
	<m3ipzig1m8.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <m31v66g0s1.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290879269 6586 80.91.229.12 (27 Nov 2010 17:34:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:34:29 +0000 (UTC)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M22803@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Nov 27 18:34:25 2010
Return-path: <ding-owner+M22803@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M22803@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1PMOfG-0001KM-93
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 18:34:22 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M22803@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1PMOel-0005ku-Rs; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:33:51 -0600
Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33])
	by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1PMOek-0005ki-26
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:33:50 -0600
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <postmaster@quimby.gnus.org>)
	id 1PMOeW-00055m-QR
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:33:49 -0600
Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1PMOeW-0004TB-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 18:33:36 +0100
Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-account@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1PMOeV-00014e-Bd
	for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 18:33:35 +0100
Original-Received: from bas3-london14-1096779322.dsl.bell.ca ([65.95.134.58])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 18:33:35 +0100
Original-Received: from jdc by bas3-london14-1096779322.dsl.bell.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 18:33:35 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Original-Lines: 9
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: bas3-london14-1096779322.dsl.bell.ca
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zHZ/s0s47A6HllG4TbsHbf8UfHI=
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:74443
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74443>

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> It apparently does.  I've now recompiled inn with openssl support, but I
> haven't put it into production yet.

Is that going to add overhead to gmane connections (and add load to the
server)?  I don't really need my gmane connections encrypted...

Dan