From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/62001 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam-use-pgp-signed? Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:35:14 +0100 Message-ID: <873bik4rml.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87oe1gmfyl.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <4nmzgv9i0d.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1140014227 15739 80.91.229.2 (15 Feb 2006 14:37:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:37:07 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+m10529@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Feb 15 15:36:55 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F9Nlg-0004so-M7 for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:36:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1F9Nld-0005Id-00; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:36:29 -0600 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1F9Nkz-0005IY-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:35:49 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F9Nkx-0003AG-O7 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:35:49 -0600 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1F9Nkw-0007wy-00 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:35:46 +0100 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F9Nke-0004dK-0B for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:35:28 +0100 Original-Received: from maportatil10.quim.ucm.es ([147.96.7.218]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:35:27 +0100 Original-Received: from oub by maportatil10.quim.ucm.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:35:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 34 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: maportatil10.quim.ucm.es X-Hashcash: 1:20:060215:gmane.emacs.gnus.general::5MM2ioGzgWGMEVSb:00000000000000000000000000000000000001FvP User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4.18 (linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0lHc8fp5dUcOyAs3OQOV7yBtURo= X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:62001 Archived-At: >>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov writes: >>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov writes: Ted> On 9 Feb 2006, oub@mat.ucm.es wrote: >> While it is posible to set the spam splitting method such that it >> detects hashcash, via spam-use-hashcash, there seems to exist no tool >> for pgp-signed-message. Is this correct? Ted> Not currently, but if it's a function that can be run on a message Ted> buffer, it will work. I just need: Ted> a) the function (or just a regexp match) Ted> b) whether it needs just the headers or the whole message Ted> (I'm guessing the whole message, which will make it a bit slow) Ted> I don't use PGP signing myself, so I don't know where to start with Ted> (a), sorry... Ted> Ted hm, May be I am wrong, but I think there is a difference between mailcrypt for pgp and the gnu support for gpg. While the former signs messages inline the letter uses mime. So may be the following cheap trick might do (setq nnimap-split-rule 'nnimap-split-fancy nnimap-split-inbox "INBOX" nnimap-split-fancy `(| ;macro ("Content-Type" "multipart/signed" "SPAM.HAM"))) Uwe