* I think I might have mistreated spam.el...
@ 2003-01-27 22:26 Andreas Fuchs
2003-01-28 1:34 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Fuchs @ 2003-01-27 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
I just found out why I had believed there was no more spam coming to
me. I use spam.el splitting, and I saw many "filing into
nnml+private:spambox" (that's my spambox) messages, but not one mail
appeared there. So now.
This is the relevant content of my .gnus:
,----
| (setq gnus-spam-process-newsgroups '(("nnml\\+private:.*" (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter
| gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter))))
| (setq gnus-spam-process-destinations '(("nnml\\+private:.*" "nnml+private:spambox")))
| (setq spam-junk-mailgroups '("nnml+private:spambox"))
| (setq spam-split-group "nnml+private:spambox")
`---- (sorry for the long lines)
After a few days of having an empty spambox, I looked into my
nnml+private active file, and saw this:
[...]
412: newsticker
1: not-a-mailing-list
[...]
K 222: nnml+private:spambox
[...]
1: spambox
Ugggh. Which of these variables is responsible for this group name? Is
it `spam-split-group'? If so, which value should it use? Just
"spambox"?
After that is resolved, my only problem is how to get the articles from
nnml+private:nnml+private:spambox into nnml+private:spambox. mv should
do it (plus faking the right .active article cound, plus rebuilding
nov), right?
Thanks,
--
Andreas Fuchs, <asf@acm.org>, asf@jabber.at, antifuchs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: I think I might have mistreated spam.el...
2003-01-27 22:26 I think I might have mistreated spam.el Andreas Fuchs
@ 2003-01-28 1:34 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-01-28 10:40 ` Andreas Fuchs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2003-01-28 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, asf@void.at wrote:
> I just found out why I had believed there was no more spam coming to
> me. I use spam.el splitting, and I saw many "filing into
> nnml+private:spambox" (that's my spambox) messages, but not one mail
> appeared there. So now.
> After a few days of having an empty spambox, I looked into my
> nnml+private active file, and saw this:
>
> [...]
> 412: newsticker
> 1: not-a-mailing-list
> [...]
> K 222: nnml+private:spambox
> [...]
> 1: spambox
>
> Ugggh. Which of these variables is responsible for this group name?
> Is it `spam-split-group'? If so, which value should it use? Just
> "spambox"?
Splitting functions will return a short group name, and the backend
will convert that to the fully qualified group name. Thus,
spam-split-group should be just "spambox" or whatever you like, and
that will translate into "nnml+private:spambox" automatically.
This is a Gnus convention (nnmail-split-fancy and nnimap-split-fancy),
not something spam.el controls AFAIK.
> After that is resolved, my only problem is how to get the articles
> from nnml+private:nnml+private:spambox into nnml+private:spambox. mv
> should do it (plus faking the right .active article cound, plus
> rebuilding nov), right?
I would enter the group, select all the articles, and move them.
Should be very quick with nnml.
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: I think I might have mistreated spam.el...
2003-01-28 1:34 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2003-01-28 10:40 ` Andreas Fuchs
2003-01-28 11:37 ` Andreas Fuchs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Fuchs @ 2003-01-28 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 2003-01-27, Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> wrote:
> Splitting functions will return a short group name, and the backend
> will convert that to the fully qualified group name. Thus,
> spam-split-group should be just "spambox" or whatever you like, and
> that will translate into "nnml+private:spambox" automatically.
>
> This is a Gnus convention (nnmail-split-fancy and nnimap-split-fancy),
> not something spam.el controls AFAIK.
Ah, I understand. Thanks for explaining that.
>> After that is resolved, my only problem is how to get the articles
>> from nnml+private:nnml+private:spambox into nnml+private:spambox. mv
>> should do it (plus faking the right .active article cound, plus
>> rebuilding nov), right?
>
> I would enter the group, select all the articles, and move them.
> Should be very quick with nnml.
That's the problem: I can't enter the bogus group. Telling gnus to enter
it makes gnus enter the "normal" nnml+private:spambox.
Hm, I'll try mv for now (-:
Thanks,
--
Andreas Fuchs, <asf@acm.org>, asf@jabber.at, antifuchs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: I think I might have mistreated spam.el...
2003-01-28 10:40 ` Andreas Fuchs
@ 2003-01-28 11:37 ` Andreas Fuchs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Fuchs @ 2003-01-28 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
Today, I <asf@void.at> wrote:
>> I would enter the group, select all the articles, and move them.
>> Should be very quick with nnml.
>
> That's the problem: I can't enter the bogus group. Telling gnus to
> enter it makes gnus enter the "normal" nnml+private:spambox.
>
> Hm, I'll try mv for now (-:
Renaming the group in the filesystem to something sensible and in the
"active" file was a better idea. It all works again, thanks for your
help, Ted.
--
Andreas Fuchs, <asf@acm.org>, asf@jabber.at, antifuchs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-28 11:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-27 22:26 I think I might have mistreated spam.el Andreas Fuchs
2003-01-28 1:34 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-01-28 10:40 ` Andreas Fuchs
2003-01-28 11:37 ` Andreas Fuchs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).