From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49691 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Fuchs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: I think I might have mistreated spam.el... Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <873cndk12p.fsf@eris.void.at> References: <87n0lmdy8s.fsf@eris.void.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043750557 17999 80.91.224.249 (28 Jan 2003 10:42:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18dTCO-0004gA-00 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:42:36 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18dTCy-0001p4-00; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:43:12 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:43:39 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA14998 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:43:27 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18dTAX-0004Xf-00 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:40:41 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@hpc.uh.edu Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18dTAU-0004XT-00 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:40:38 +0100 Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never X-Url: http://asf.void.at/ X-Attribution: asf X-Face: 3*3w/y?I6|`'CYW7F~m0]U1)L\|[x"?/V6^;s3FU#q|F'AL(3C?$eslHvAmR:KjT"&LZeqM 0wMS%HM` Cancel-Lock: sha1:MC1Ryz4VsTl3T6Bkg5cNMuwpLK4= Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49691 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49691 On 2003-01-27, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > Splitting functions will return a short group name, and the backend > will convert that to the fully qualified group name. Thus, > spam-split-group should be just "spambox" or whatever you like, and > that will translate into "nnml+private:spambox" automatically. > > This is a Gnus convention (nnmail-split-fancy and nnimap-split-fancy), > not something spam.el controls AFAIK. Ah, I understand. Thanks for explaining that. >> After that is resolved, my only problem is how to get the articles >> from nnml+private:nnml+private:spambox into nnml+private:spambox. mv >> should do it (plus faking the right .active article cound, plus >> rebuilding nov), right? > > I would enter the group, select all the articles, and move them. > Should be very quick with nnml. That's the problem: I can't enter the bogus group. Telling gnus to enter it makes gnus enter the "normal" nnml+private:spambox. Hm, I'll try mv for now (-: Thanks, -- Andreas Fuchs, , asf@jabber.at, antifuchs