From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26104 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hrvoje Niksic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Numbering invisible parts Date: 01 Nov 1999 04:43:47 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <873duqzxjg.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> References: <87aeoz14yq.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> <87k8o3yrn9.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163374 17610 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:22:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA21348 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 22:44:23 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAB13598; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 21:44:20 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 31 Oct 1999 21:44:39 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA13789 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 21:44:29 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from pc-hrvoje.srce.hr (mail@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr [161.53.2.132]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA21335 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 22:43:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from hniksic by pc-hrvoje.srce.hr with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 11i8Nt-0006pQ-00 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 1999 04:43:53 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Hrvoje X-Face: &{dT~)Pu6V<0y?>3p$;@vh\`C7xB~A0T-J%Og)J,@-1%q6Q+, gs<-9M#&`I8cJp2b1{vPE|~+JE+gx;a7%BG{}nY^ehK1"q#rG O,Rn1A_Cy%t]V=Brv7h I don't care too much either way but it occurs to me that if inlined > parts that are not buttonized are not counted then the button > numbers have to change when someone does a K-b. Yes, they'd change in that case. But in that case a bunch of new buttons would become visible, so the change should be fine. One things that bothers me about `K b' is that it's very slow. It would be really nice if it merely inserted the buttons. As it is, it probably re-parses the message (I haven't checked.)