Re: Not a timetable

[Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@amaunet.cs.uni-dortmund.de>]

>>>>> Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net> writes:

  > It is not a matter of usability.  It is a matter of the fact that
  > it is impossible to build FSF Emacs 20 without MULE code when MULE
  > is neither required nor desired.

`vi has the Ctrl-d and Ctrl-u commands which I never need.  Therefore
I don't use vi.'

Strange strange.

I think removing all features you don't use from all programs you use
is going to be a lot of work.

If one has emotional reasons for something then one should go ahead
and say so, rather than rationalizing in a way that causes other
people to try to explain the flaws in their logic.

A friend of mine says he doesn't want to use an editor which he can
program and therefore sticks to vi (nvi without the Perl stuff, to be
precise).  I wouldn't dream of trying to discuss with him -- he's
happy and that's fine.  But then he doesn't discuss with me -- I'm
happy and that's fine, too.

kai
-- 
OOP: object oriented programming;  OOPS: object oriented mistakes