From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/84717 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: "loopback" email setup for testing? Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 20:42:33 +0800 Message-ID: <874my4s346.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87k370s4iy.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874my4wbpr.fsf@igel.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1406378595 18826 80.91.229.3 (26 Jul 2014 12:43:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:43:15 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M32960@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Jul 26 14:43:06 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XB1JY-0001Q9-W7 for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:43:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1XB1JK-0001Uc-OI; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:42:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1XB1JJ-0001UM-1H for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:42:49 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XB1JI-0001ZB-7m for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:42:48 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XB1JG-0007pS-Rx for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:42:46 +0200 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XB1JG-0001BX-Bn for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:42:46 +0200 Original-Received: from 123.123.23.93 ([123.123.23.93]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:42:46 +0200 Original-Received: from eric by 123.123.23.93 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:42:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.123.23.93 User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2A8/lNlBJToI/mrdMNWI5uy/Hi4= X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-516--4630h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-367--3291h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-367--3291h-0s--0d--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-351--3147h-0s--0d--H*u:linux, 0.000-351--3147h-0s--0d--H*UA:linux Spam tokens: 0.993-22801--916h-79709s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.993-28311--1200h-99182s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.993-29405--1261h-103064s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.991-29158--1510h-103069s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:quimby.gnus.org, 0.991-29158--1510h-103069s--0d--H*RT:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: no -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 2.0 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:84717 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> I'm doing a bunch of email testing, and feel sort of stupid littering >> one email account with bogus "test #24" messages from another, over and >> over again. Not to mention it would be nice to be able to test gnus and >> related functions while offline. > > You don't need to be online to be able to deliver mail locally. That's what I meant -- if I could do the testing locally, I wouldn't have to be online. >> I've never used the unix mail spool -- is this something I could do >> locally, in a way that gnus wouldn't know the messages weren't going >> anywhere? > > You could add a procmail rule that just discards the mails. Okay, thanks for the tip. I suppose that's something I'd have to install and set up. I'll take a look...