From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/84642 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Peter_M=C3=BCnster?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: entering a group is slow Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:30:45 +0200 Message-ID: <874mzg4mey.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> References: <87mwdhmb9y.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <87ha3pszqe.fsf@gmail.com> <87d2ecj48r.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <877g4g9d5r.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <877g4fgbwb.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87vbrz9a49.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <87lhsu3afl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <877g4e7exl.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <87wqceuqac.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87oaxqrkze.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <87vbrxs5wv.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <874mzhs05s.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <87ionx5aen.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403213513 1461 80.91.229.3 (19 Jun 2014 21:31:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 21:31:53 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M32885@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Jun 19 23:31:46 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wxjvt-0006Wt-9H for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:31:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1WxjvF-00083k-Kv; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:31:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1WxjvD-00083L-Et for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WxjvC-0007Df-H5 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WxjvA-0007FU-I5 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:31:00 +0200 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wxjv8-0005Pu-6y for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:30:58 +0200 Original-Received: from arennes-651-1-118-78.w2-2.abo.wanadoo.fr ([2.2.13.78]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:30:58 +0200 Original-Received: from pmlists by arennes-651-1-118-78.w2-2.abo.wanadoo.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:30:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 32 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: arennes-651-1-118-78.w2-2.abo.wanadoo.fr User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (=?utf-8?Q?=E7=9C=9F?= Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:FwJTsalmLLXMNUAzoyNaa5BSxwQ= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:84642 Archived-At: On Thu, Jun 19 2014, Eric S Fraga wrote: > Wow! Mine does not, or not noticeably so. The delay, if any, is > network latency and the email server, in my case. Oh, then I would really like to know, where emacs spends the cpu-time on my system... And why it can become much slower suddenly. > Sure but if emacs is competing for cpu with anything else, this matters. Right. But it was not the case on my system. (I use xosview for monitoring the CPUs: 3 were idle, and the fourth was at 100% because of emacs.) >> Or perhaps I've done something particular, that has made emacs slow? >> What could it be...? > > What about the summary line? Do you have a highly customised one? In > my case, the user date function actually contributes non-negligibly to > the time gnus takes in preparing the summary buffer... I've tested with the default line, there is no difference. > otherwise, I am out of ideas and maybe somebody else can jump in! That would be really appreciated! Thanks for your efforts, -- Peter