From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/82644 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: couple of questions about api Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:48:12 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <874njfi3ur.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87d2z4eagy.fsf@redhat.com> Reply-To: ding@gnus.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356119409 7908 80.91.229.3 (21 Dec 2012 19:50:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 19:50:09 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M30910@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Dec 21 20:50:23 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm8bq-0007Yc-OL for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:50:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm8bb-0000kI-GZ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:50:03 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm8bZ-0000jv-Uv for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:50:01 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm8bY-00015p-HX for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:50:01 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm8bX-0005FC-3f for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:49:59 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm8bc-0007Nk-8M for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:50:04 +0100 Original-Received: from c-65-96-148-157.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([65.96.148.157]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:50:04 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-65-96-148-157.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:50:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 32 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-65-96-148-157.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Cqc7TeZ9gyZK+UZl2nIEqfbmhQg= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:82644 Archived-At: On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:05:01 +0100 Nikola Pajkovsky wrote: NP> Hey folks, NP> Let's say I have these mails in summary NP> [ 31: Mark Brown ] [PATCH 0/5] mfd: arizona: Updates for v3.7 NP> [ 553: Mark Brown ] [PATCH 1/5] mfd: wm5102: Update register patch for latest evaluation NP> [ 27: Mark Brown ] [PATCH 2/5] mfd: wm5110: Disable control interface error report for WM5110 rev B NP> [ 34: Mark Brown ] [PATCH 3/5] mfd: arizona: Use correct array for ARRAY_SIZE in mfd_add_devices call NP> [ 37: Mark Brown ] [PATCH 4/5] mfd: arizona: Correctly report when AIF2/AIF1 is underclocked NP> [ 45: Mark Brown ] [PATCH 5/5] mfd: arizona: Sync regcache after reset NP> I found the function gnus-fetch-field which works fine in Article NP> buffer, but not in Summary buffer. See code NP> (global-set-key (kbd "\C-xpg") 'get-message-id) NP> (defun get-message-id () NP> (car (nthcdr 1 (mail-extract-address-components NP> (gnus-fetch-field "message-id"))))) NP> What do I have to call to get message-id from mail header from Summary NP> buffer? NP> And how to make it work with process markers? I'd like to mark some mail NP> and get message-id one by one. The gnus-registry needed these functions too, since it works with message IDs primarily. Take a look, especially at the registry mark commands. Ted