From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80094 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus registry upgrade didn't import old registry Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:37:13 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <874nzwnpza.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87ehzkh4j2.fsf@uwo.ca> <87litbxd7x.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zkhr11n1.fsf@uwo.ca> <87r533111i.fsf@uwo.ca> <87zkhruflt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwjizqbc.fsf@uwo.ca> <87sjnizp8y.fsf@uwo.ca> <8762kdu18w.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxdp1j53.fsf@uwo.ca> Reply-To: ding@gnus.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317256826 17996 80.91.229.12 (29 Sep 2011 00:40:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:40:26 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M28388@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Sep 29 02:40:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R94fl-0002iY-77 for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:40:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R94ff-0003Jq-CT; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:40:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R94fe-0003Jb-38 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:40:14 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R94fd-0006cs-03 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:40:13 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R94fb-0002rZ-KS for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:40:11 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R94fa-0002dg-49 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:40:10 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.133 ([38.98.147.133]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:40:10 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.133 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 02:40:10 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 58 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.133 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:c6hiuZYGRUQZWjlKTFIEJ/hBZuU= X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80094 Archived-At: On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:43:36 -0400 Dan Christensen wrote: DC> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> Could you look at what the following produces? This should simulate >> the candidates that `registry-prune' gets: >> >> (let* ((db gnus-registry-db) >> (hs (oref db :max-hard)) >> (ss (oref db :max-soft))) >> (oset db :max-hard 10000) >> (oset db :max-soft most-positive-fixnum) >> (prog1 (list (registry-prune-soft-candidates db) >> (registry-prune-hard-candidates db)) >> (oset db :max-hard hs) >> (oset db :max-soft ss))) DC> The output is long and is shown with ...: DC> ((536870911 (nil "<20110913120207.7B6336142@lwahl>" DC> "fake+none+nndraft:drafts+1" "fake+none+nndraft:drafts+2" DC> "<73b0a166382dc.4e6e5c38@uwo.ca>" DC> "<1315880651.2311.22.camel@mike-desktop>" DC> "<4E6F239E.8030506@gmail.com>" "<4E6EAF23.1070406@uwo.ca>" DC> "" DC> "<2139667233.835036.1315899248272.JavaMail.app@ela4-bed46.prod>" DC> "<4E6F60C1.7090809@wagnerrp.com>" DC> "" ...)) (8997.2 nil)) DC> But there's a lot in that sub-list starting with nil: DC> (length (cadar result)) DC> 10028 Hmmmm. I'll think about it, nothing obvious so far. Sorry. DC> Could it be that during the import-eld process, pruning doesn't take DC> place? Right. DC> But why then was I still getting errors when new mail was arriving? DC> (And could those be reduced to warnings, so that one can still DC> receive mail when a problem occurs?) I think the hard limit was not adjusted somehow (maybe because of the abort). Could you please look at (let* ((db gnus-registry-db) (list (oref db :max-hard)) (oref db :max-soft))) and see if it's 100K or 10K for the hard limit (and what's the soft limit). I haven't seen your data files yet, perhaps my spam filter ate them. I'll look again. They should help me duplicate the problem. Thanks! Ted