From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80056 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus registry upgrade didn't import old registry Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:57:59 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <874nzzvue0.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87ehzkh4j2.fsf@uwo.ca> <87litbxd7x.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vcsf11gb.fsf@uwo.ca> Reply-To: ding@gnus.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317074438 25346 80.91.229.12 (26 Sep 2011 22:00:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:00:38 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M28350@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Sep 27 00:00:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R8JE0-0001Fi-U0 for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R8JDv-0005vf-Gr; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:00:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R8JDu-0005vY-LC for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:00:26 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R8JDk-0001Fo-8Y for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:00:26 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R8JDi-00017E-S9 for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:14 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R8JDh-00018k-B3 for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:13 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.133 ([38.98.147.133]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:13 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.133 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:13 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.133 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9Q2gjjz3a2vktzXDg24rM44dlJc= X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80056 Archived-At: On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:41:08 -0400 Dan Christensen wrote: DC> Oh, is it normal that the .eieio file is a few times bigger than the DC> .eld file? For 10000 entries, my .eld file is 1MB and my .eieio file DC> is 3MB. It's all done by EIEIO so I haven't worried about the size. We store more information, perhaps that's why. Is the size the same between the old and the new registry? Ted