From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78770 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam =?utf-8?Q?Sj=C3=B8gren?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Trying to enter a group: "registry max-hard size limit reached" Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:29:15 +0200 Organization: koldfront - analysis & revolution, Copenhagen, Denmark Message-ID: <874o5226is.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> References: <877ha09a5k.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87pqnsxnud.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87tyd4b0uo.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwondanx.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305023719 5220 80.91.229.12 (10 May 2011 10:35:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:35:19 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M27071@lists.math.uh.edu Tue May 10 12:35:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJkHa-0004qk-Su for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:35:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QJkHW-0002yc-I9; Tue, 10 May 2011 05:35:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QJkHV-0002yV-Lr for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 10 May 2011 05:35:09 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QJkHU-00051D-Rp for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 10 May 2011 05:35:09 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QJkHT-0002wz-Fs for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:35:07 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJkHT-0004ni-Az for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:35:07 +0200 Original-Received: from 2505ds5-by.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.24.143]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:35:07 +0200 Original-Received: from asjo by 2505ds5-by.0.fullrate.dk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 12:35:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 2505ds5-by.0.fullrate.dk Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: )qY&CseJ?.:=8F#^~GcSA?F=9eu'{KAFfL1C3/A&:nE?PW\i65"ba0NS)97,Q(^@xk}n4Ou rPuR#V8I(J_@~H($[ym:`K_+]*kjvW>xH5jbgLBVFGXY:(#4P>zVBklLbdL&XxL\M)%T}3S/IS9lMJ ^St'=VZBR Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78770 Archived-At: On Mon, 09 May 2011 12:52:02 -0500, Ted wrote: > Now the code calls `registry-prune' but will still fail if the registry > is full. I think that's the right thing to do, though I could ask the > user if he wants to increase `gnus-registry-max-entries'. So how does it compare to before the registry rewrite? The way it was handled then Just Worked(tm) for me for years, even with the small value I had set... Best regards, Adam -- "Last year I was very tired." Adam Sjøgren asjo@koldfront.dk