From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78153 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: normal-mode considered dangerous Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:19:53 +0200 Message-ID: <874o6mvtra.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> References: <8739m6htqq.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301412046 27922 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2011 15:20:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: ding-owner+M26464@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Mar 29 17:20:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4aik-0005Jj-SG for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:20:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4aiH-0002L4-8c; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:20:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4aiF-0002Ks-Ru for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4aiE-0008SP-SL for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174] helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4aiD-0001c4-DJ for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:20:05 +0200 Original-Received: from keller.adm.naquadah.org (keller.adm.naquadah.org [192.168.2.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD3AA5C134; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:19:58 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: Ted Zlatanov , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <8739m6htqq.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:43:57 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78153 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 29 2011, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > Why wouldn't you test before committing+pushing? Make a branch or send > a patch if you're not sure. Well, because I'm rather confident the patch is correct, or is at worst a no-op. Making a branch or sending a patch would have been more much work for me and/or for Lars to test, than to send in a fix. I admit it may be a little cavalier. :) =2D-=20 Julien Danjou =E2=9D=B1 http://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNkfiZAAoJEGEbqVCLeKXC1fMQALlXZMtVEXEYbi2x0wxZd4y3 r5zPFamIwET898KQPafgCrYcSZ7tV5LAO/xRzUd9RfhisiU+n5JQg0DTyM1sQDbO W6JUpUvIMANbncmyhjC7/P31YJNwdcW7x7rxglGEkj2uFLpPae0OFGTtylqOQIk1 uaU4bZitlWYhGuwQzGVUI9CifRc2rkTmTDwu7FFNbLl9unljYUpPkbsXCZ9LdbqK vvcUa6S1jZ07bEu0g9wfOqzU5l7j4c8y/d04vBNWm0wasedtx9IQfANTm3lHUjBq sF2uXEFDQOJ2z/SJQpqYOiwuBd5Z8fYWjg5NwPYTYTBbOy86138CqByGHCYrNl7W WcYi4amLM8BrQtZ9yc+V2SBR0KbNNjeX3ThvXdunDf/7daMS4F5PgNWAMx+F2zMk AtNfIx45ph9hOMGuq/x1PXSGdGmo77XF4u0+Pvr/6muIODPr0Xa1IPPSNZRZfU9+ Xg3/Td3f1wvmboCZZXcG0h7/WU4VBGhKCDdsWLi0fMvsfz2LNR5BXn0lYajFyh4Y szbp44MXXlZiT1sms9aoacZXMaGb93tzUJLwljqhB+6YbUHEXG4WkQ6UofoY3+H5 FsFyEGyEQ0C8Em+lksCw2VTU/8qQNlnUbYgOsN5cFBmc2+jsbjOW5KtgQbkOT43Z sY1upvLSJ8zyWBPwgrHV =gBgn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--