From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69873 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Memnon Anon Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: unsent messages Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:16:50 +0200 Message-ID: <874of9fqhs.fsf@mean.albasani.net> References: <87y6cxwyji.fsf@pellet.net> <87d3u8eqti.fsf@mean.albasani.net> <87fwyvcyqb.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aap1iyg3.fsf@mean.albasani.net> <87k4o51pq6.fsf@pellet.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280997989 26502 80.91.229.12 (5 Aug 2010 08:46:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18260@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Aug 05 10:46:27 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogw5r-0006tl-3L for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:46:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogw53-00061f-L4; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:45:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogw51-00061Q-0W for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:45:35 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ogw4z-0007N9-3U for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:45:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ogw4y-0008Gm-00 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:45:32 +0200 Original-Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so2781196ewy.17 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 01:45:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:message-id:references:user-agent:date:mime-version :content-type; bh=hOxXIXUu3LGky3X5opR5Mb3lmVv4Tqu3x/5WFXhTNh8=; b=SRjQGxQIl3BhZkvbTVmwfGZdtxm9UFdQy45RvbCIE6ZaQYxa+EYIra+a10eCAm2SXZ gPQv2FWDwcKxZzzZYXiaubgBJf9bJP5XJxCbu6E1zQraWTay1PqG9EdT1RYjiTLWfzFZ gY6aww6JAB/4T0DoW6DvodoIeKktV8GBmzpRs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:user-agent :date:mime-version:content-type; b=AvZGsy2Fh+MvB+S5woEW6B4NuAQc8jyWx3BWZ9uUEWSHDQP80HkJ42lr4z8mgmIDHz QG/QxOIs7grem0+7NJzBBr+53zmfBJndWcU+Jpnnj/vfYaV3p4fy17bZw+orkSd5/D3E fOXkzQC5qQdfhU+y/8vg/LF1sB3AQU38hIDMA= Original-Received: by 10.213.28.134 with SMTP id m6mr2897095ebc.65.1280997931681; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 01:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (e178221198.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.221.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v8sm14356195eeh.14.2010.08.05.01.45.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 05 Aug 2010 01:45:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k4o51pq6.fsf@pellet.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Thu, 05 Aug 2010 00:30:09 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69873 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > It seems to be working fine, but the original problem was so sporadic > it's really hard to know. I can say that since I started using the queue > I don't seem to have lost any messages. > > I also don't know who to "blame", though it does seem that msmtp would > leave something in the logs if it choked... Well, just keep using it and if you find a message queued that should have been sent, please post the corresponding lines of your log files; it will happen eventually, I assume. Have a look at these excerpts from my logs: ,---- msmtp.queue.log | 2010 27 Jul 19:55:13 : mail for [ -oi -f | gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com -t ] : send was successful | ! 2010 27 Jul 20:09:07 : mail for [ -oi -f xxx@xxx.xxx -t ] : couldn't ! be sent - host not connected ! 2010 27 Jul 20:09:07 : enqueued mail as : [ 2010-07-27-20.09.07 ] ( ! -oi -f xxx@gmx.net -t ) : successful | | 2010 27 Jul 20:27:40 : mail for [ -oi -f | gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com -t ] : send was successful `---- ,---- msmtp.log | Jul 27 19:55:13 host=smtp.gmail.com tls=on auth=on | user=gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com | from=gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com | recipients=xxx@live.com mailsize=121663 smtpstatus=250 | smtpmsg='250 2.0.0 OK 1280253313 a9sm4036453bxx.23' exitcode=EX_OK | | Jul 27 20:27:40 host=smtp.gmail.com tls=on auth=on | user=gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com | from=gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com | recipients=eric@ericabrahamsen.net,ding@gnus.org mailsize=2758 | smtpstatus=250 smtpmsg='250 2.0.0 OK 1280255260 f10sm4061429bkl.17' | exitcode=EX_OK `---- "couldn't be sent - host not connected" : I was definately online when I sent that mail. Thats why I think my (really) unreliable wifi is responsible. Lets see what your logs will say. Maybe, I should ask on the msmtp list, but not yet.