From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65946 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jidanni@jidanni.org Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: keep Gcc: field in buffer after sending Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:27:57 +0800 Message-ID: <874peo48s2.fsf@jidanni.org> References: <86ejdshm4u.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1197448169 27347 80.91.229.12 (12 Dec 2007 08:29:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:29:29 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14440@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Dec 12 09:29:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J2MyG-0008UW-Um for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:29:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1J2Mx7-0007rd-EV; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:28:25 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1J2Mx5-0007rQ-ND for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:28:23 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1J2Mx0-00044T-5j for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:28:23 -0600 Original-Received: from lax-green-bigip-5.dreamhost.com ([208.113.200.5] helo=looneymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1J2Mwx-0007vP-00 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:28:15 +0100 Original-Received: from jidanni2 (122-127-48-189.dynamic.hinet.net [122.127.48.189]) by looneymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E02C15DD3F for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:28:14 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.1.9 2007-02-13) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0126 Ham tokens: 0.000-294--702h-0s--0d--UD:el, 0.000-3774--9050h-5s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-3496--8385h-5s--0d--H*MI:fsf, 0.001-25--59h-0s--0d--patching, 0.003-8--19h-0s--1d--FAILED Spam tokens: 0.947-2753--1226h-50128s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.947-2753--1226h-50128s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.918-1968--1887h-48565s--0d--H*r:quimby.gnus.org, 0.913-1828--2030h-48608s--0d--H*r:3.35, 0.912-1828--2082h-49257s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org Autolearn status: no 1.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name -1.1 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5% [score: 0.0126] 0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65946 Archived-At: TZ> That's good, but did you test the patch itself? I won't commit it until TZ> at least one user has tested it... $ patch gnus-msg.el patch patching file gnus-msg.el Hunk #2 FAILED at 1635. 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gnus-msg.el.rej $ apt-cache policy emacs22-el Installed: 22.1+1-2.2 500 http://linux.cdpa.nsysu.edu.tw sid/main Packages That's right, I have not implemented a cutting edge version test bed, so, "I trust that your patch must work".