Re: spam.el reporting and moving ham out of spam groups.

[asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren)]

On Tue, 25 May 2004 23:17:34 +1000, Daniel wrote:

> Unfortunately, it doesn't seem possible to set spam.el to process
> messages as ham without setting the group classification as 'spam'.

That's right, I think.

I think spam.el would be doing "what-I-mean" more if it ham-processed
messages marked as ham in unclassified groups in addition to spam
groups (that is, all non-ham groups).

(If I mark something as ham, I want it ham-processed (unless it is in
a ham-group, then I've probably marked it by mistake O:-))

I'm using this tiny patch:

@@ -776,8 +838,8 @@
       (spam-ham-copy-routine
        (gnus-parameter-ham-process-destination gnus-newsgroup-name)))
 
-    ;; now move all ham articles out of spam groups
-    (when (spam-group-spam-contents-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
+    ;; now move all ham articles out of non-ham groups
+    (when (not (spam-group-ham-contents-p gnus-newsgroup-name))
       (gnus-message 5 "Moving ham messages from spam group")
       (spam-ham-move-routine
        (gnus-parameter-ham-process-destination gnus-newsgroup-name))))

As discussed in the thread that starts with:
 <news:4ny8nn0wpu.fsf@lifelogs.com>

I think the jury is still out on whether the change makes sense
(except to me :-))


  Best regards,

-- 
 "Stop blowing holes in my ship!"                             Adam Sjøgren
                                                         asjo@koldfront.dk