* new mail all split in nndiary
@ 2001-09-24 3:27 Colin Walters
2001-09-24 10:12 ` Didier Verna
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Colin Walters @ 2001-09-24 3:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
Today I went to check my new mail, and for some reason all of it ended
up in my nndiary group. I was able to process-mark it all (M P a),
then respooling (B r) seemed to work.
Fortunately (well, sort of), this wasn't reproducible. I restarted
Gnus and Emacs, and all seemed well.
Does anyone know of any recent changes that might have caused this?
I'm running CVS as of early yesterday evening.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: new mail all split in nndiary
2001-09-24 3:27 new mail all split in nndiary Colin Walters
@ 2001-09-24 10:12 ` Didier Verna
2001-09-24 22:20 ` Colin Walters
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Didier Verna @ 2001-09-24 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: ding
Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org> wrote:
> Today I went to check my new mail, and for some reason all of it ended
> up in my nndiary group. I was able to process-mark it all (M P a),
> then respooling (B r) seemed to work.
>
> Fortunately (well, sort of), this wasn't reproducible. I restarted
> Gnus and Emacs, and all seemed well.
>
> Does anyone know of any recent changes that might have caused this?
> I'm running CVS as of early yesterday evening.
The only important thing that changed in CVS is that the variable
nndiary-get-new-mail has been turned to nil by default. The only thing I can
think of is that you have it set to t, and you have a broken procmail rule or
so, that splited all your mail in the nndiary-mail-sources folder.
--
Didier Verna, didier@lrde.epita.fr, http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
EPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel.+33 (1) 53 14 59 47
94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France Fax.+33 (1) 44 08 01 99 didier@xemacs.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: new mail all split in nndiary
2001-09-24 10:12 ` Didier Verna
@ 2001-09-24 22:20 ` Colin Walters
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Colin Walters @ 2001-09-24 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr> writes:
> The only important thing that changed in CVS is that the
> variable nndiary-get-new-mail has been turned to nil by default. The
> only thing I can think of is that you have it set to t, and you have
> a broken procmail rule or so, that splited all your mail in the
> nndiary-mail-sources folder.
I do have `nndiary-get-new-mail' set to t. But I haven't touched my
~/.procmailrc in quite a while, so I don't think there was a problem
with it.
Oh, well. I guess we can just call this one a heisenbug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-09-24 22:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-09-24 3:27 new mail all split in nndiary Colin Walters
2001-09-24 10:12 ` Didier Verna
2001-09-24 22:20 ` Colin Walters
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).