From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26487
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: David Maslen <david.maslen@iname.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Postfix or Gnus problem in to: header?
Date: 10 Nov 1999 00:17:18 +1100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <874sevhkip.fsf@iname.com>
References: <87ln88p72n.fsf@iname.com> <2nr9i0w67i.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163687 19666 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:28:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:28:07 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA16981
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 08:17:48 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAB32537;
	Tue, 9 Nov 1999 07:17:43 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 09 Nov 1999 07:17:42 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA28011
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 07:17:30 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mail.vicnet.net.au (merri.vicnet.net.au [203.10.72.9])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA16974
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 08:16:54 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from imp.taz.net.au (nas06-039.dialup.vicnet.net.au [202.137.72.104])
	by mail.vicnet.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 087D3F8005; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 00:16:40 +1100 (EST)
Original-Received: from imp.taz.net.au (trinity.2d.private [10.10.10.9])
	by imp.taz.net.au (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 762B62A002; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 00:19:10 +1100 (EST)
Original-Received: by imp.taz.net.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 10 Nov 1999 00:17:18 +1100
Original-To: Shenghuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>, ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Shenghuo ZHU's message of "09 Nov 1999 01:05:05 -0500"
Original-Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070099 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.99) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26487
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26487

Shenghuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu> writes:
> I am not sure what Postfix does. But there is a bug about the quoted
> comma in in XEmacs mail-lib (less than 1.24). So try again after
> removing the comma in the "To:" field.

OK, tried it.
To: "dmm dmm" <dmm@imp.taz.net.au>      works
To: "dmm, dmm" <dmm@imp.taz.net.au>     fails 
To: "dmm dmm" (dmm@imp.taz.net.au)      works

The last one puzzles me. This is the format that gnus-bug generates.
Using () instead of <> around the address. Postfix doesn't seem to be
able to handle this. Is that a postfix bug?

I accept the first is a bug in the mail-lib.