From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/21649 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans de Graaff Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Un-MIMEified MIME message Date: 27 Feb 1999 10:50:35 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <874so8b2fo.fsf@graaff.xs4all.nl> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159714 24014 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:21:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA10983 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 1999 07:37:20 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAB25527; Sat, 27 Feb 1999 06:36:23 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 27 Feb 1999 06:36:33 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA22613 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 1999 06:36:23 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from graaff.xs4all.nl (qmailr@graaff.xs4all.nl [194.109.62.76]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA10965 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 1999 07:36:01 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 11047 invoked by uid 1000); 27 Feb 1999 09:50:36 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: ,i^c$X{l+r}VV%(bl{^[ writes: > * When I enter the message with in the summary buffer, it > sends me to the bottom of the message. > > * All of the mail headers are displayed. Not the normal short headers > fontified. > > * If I hit t gnus-summary-toggle-header I get the short headers but > the body disappears. > > You know, I'm known for having unusual computer problems, but I hope > others are seeing this. ;-) I saw all of that too. Perhaps this is because we aren't using the latest version of w3. I recall some discussion on that version being needed for correct display of HTML stuff. Hans