From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (mx1.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.32]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D284289DF for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:08:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1szOjr-00000000lWP-2E88 for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 18:08:03 -0500 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1szOjl-00000005Ljf-0K6X for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 18:07:57 -0500 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1szOjj-00000005LjY-2I13 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 18:07:55 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1szOji-0000000HT7T-22Ru for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 11 Oct 2024 18:07:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References :Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kkfvE5a9l1byDeiZa0eGXAtXkoRlvWUYUOYn3aMjT64=; b=CZXI15Ij+lbV8dIlhTnsFekPme WS1DrsYV0HLo3Y76ptSsbFINM0zFxRkKrf4AJVvH5Q2wQcFmaMgG/wtHxk2XkTvkjh7LLjdIZWill vABsQQVweQg6sgNW7z7ZQms9wJkT/iWMEnGplFeyJIaYeJ5uJH6c5k+wryOHXyzVY2Aw=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1szOjb-0005KL-W8 for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:07:49 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1szOja-0008n3-QM for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 01:07:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: ding@gnus.org From: Divya Ranjan Subject: Re: Agent and IMAP Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 23:07:40 +0000 Message-ID: <875xpyqlvn.fsf@subvertising.org> References: <874j5is2i8.fsf@subvertising.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:MXNIkLvk/WXwQfzGUU0BYeD49Uc= List-ID: Precedence: bulk Greg Troxel writes: > No clue about your query, but I wanted to point out that gmane use > causes spam filtering woes. Your domain has a DMARC reject policy, > and the message as it arrived did not have a DKIM header from your > domain, nor was it from your domain's SPF record. > > Spamassassin says > > * 1.8 DMARC_REJECT DMARC reject policy > > and I can't say it's wrong. I would say that it's not ok to use gmane > to messages whose From: domain has a DMARC policy (other than none). > Yes, that used to be normal... Can you describe more as to what the issue here is? I’m not sure how DMARC affects me, or my engagement with gmane-based newsgroups. With regards to my email domain, subvertising.org is one of the aliases provided by my email service, Autistici/Inventati (autistici.org). What exactly are the consequences of using gmane with domains that have DMARC policy? Apologies if it has or might cause any inconvenience, I am unaware of this. Regards, -- Divya Ranjan, Philosophy, Mathematics, Libre Software.