From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (mx1.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.32]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904ED25C84 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 03:08:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdKz8-00000000xJg-1e4h for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 20:08:22 -0600 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdKz8-00000000t6g-0VS0 for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 20:08:22 -0600 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdKz0-00000000t6X-0UI0 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 20:08:19 -0600 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdKyz-00000000xJ4-03hh for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 20:08:13 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=K3Y5q78uT+ejz5kUYLLCkfu2Nd8EOn3TUJtz8B2cq5c=; b=footnkm2Hp93KVqiq76qp8XMof Oblp1ufGooGFNtbnlu80uSW+92Xy+rZLJFGShMV2DoXg5vlyoaHa5fXtEoha67cUPIbJ0Ws13n7rt TACqgoEAb+KgjXTtkxeEcICE0Hh2FNkHGJzg0MTqPKK4sulwkOYLmKcd+L0knUDvsQ2k=; Received: from mail.ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rdKys-0006qe-CA for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 03:08:08 +0100 Received: from localhost (71-212-21-65.tukw.qwest.net [71.212.21.65]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55B51FA0B2; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 02:08:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1708654083; bh=K3Y5q78uT+ejz5kUYLLCkfu2Nd8EOn3TUJtz8B2cq5c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=pinYSWeBv2ZSfCTQIrR5eUYGEHMURBH4/d3z87I3M8qwK8FOy1TFHjdxhTGEXFCDi ir1H45SsIGd0nG+k1AWL6L8fHV7ZY7v5neskVk0X/M+zuhczSTx+m6OEk1wReLh4tN j8eyokL0iUX1JYF5ZeAu1THdqJKK+8vsCHt2wY0I= From: Eric Abrahamsen To: Eric S Fraga Cc: ding@gnus.org Subject: Re: gnus-group-change-level In-Reply-To: <87cysssovx.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Mon, 19 Feb 2024 10:57:06 +0000") References: <87le7ly3hn.fsf@igel.home> <87ttm5psvr.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87ttm5mt8a.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87cysssovx.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 18:08:02 -0800 Message-ID: <875xyggcfx.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: Precedence: bulk Eric S Fraga writes: > On Sunday, 18 Feb 2024 at 20:26, James Cloos wrote: >> I was testing with a switch from 11 to 55 (I have this block in .gnus: > > [...] > >> and make significant use of levels for organizing the groups.) > > Thank you for this. Some time ago, I tried changing from the 1-5 levels > that is the gnus default and ended up with a totally confused system, > probably because I missed some of the variables I needed to set. So I > will now try with your list of variables to see how it goes. I don't > need 100 group levels but 10 or so would be nice. Part of the reason I was surprised here is that the various `gnus-level-*' variables, far from being user options, are actually defined with `defconst', which would indicate that Gnus didn't want you fooling with them. It's possible that was done so that the variables are marked as "special", but defcustom would have the same effect. Anyway, it's encouraging to know that it's been working correctly for some people for a while.