From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80958 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: bug#10238: R in gnus-summary does not pop a frame like F does Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:34:48 -0600 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <8762fya353.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87pqe8kbg1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83pqe823oj.fsf@gnu.org> <87vco0ivb1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wr8fhloi.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878vkvgzm6.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327588612 3600 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2012 14:36:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10238@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab , ding@gnus.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 15:36:46 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqQRR-0006JU-HD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:36:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46307 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqQRR-0003fP-29 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:36:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqQRJ-0003eE-Pz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:36:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqQRC-0003JH-Ot for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:36:37 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqQRC-0003JB-KF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:36:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqQRi-0002D6-Bz; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10238 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 10238-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10238.13275885698437 (code B ref 10238); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10238) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2012 14:36:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45124 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqQQl-0002Bu-Jg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:36:09 -0500 Original-Received: from cer-mailmxol2.jumptrading.com ([208.78.214.25]:26661) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqQQe-0002BK-Vp for 10238@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:36:02 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApwEAN4iIU/AqF0N/2dsb2JhbABDr0uBcgEBBXkQCw0UJQ8BBEkOBcAiiT0QAQgBBgQDAwQfAwECgmUdDoEFIAIBCwEFAgeDNASIP5JXjHc Original-Received: from unknown (HELO chiexchange02.w2k.jumptrading.com) ([192.168.93.13]) by cer-mailmxol2.jumptrading.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2012 14:36:45 +0000 Original-Received: from internalsmtp.w2k.jumptrading.com (10.2.4.29) by chiexchange02.w2k.jumptrading.com (10.2.4.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.176.0; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:35:18 -0600 Original-Received: from tzlatanov-ubuntu-desktop.jumptrading.com ([10.2.27.110]) by internalsmtp.w2k.jumptrading.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:35:18 -0600 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <878vkvgzm6.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:56:49 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2012 14:35:18.0626 (UTC) FILETIME=[B9D99C20:01CCDC37] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56032 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80958 Archived-At: On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:56:49 +0100 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: LI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> But forcing the Gnus developers to use 80 chars in their own work >> seems too harsh. LI> I don't mind the 80-character limit. But it can be kinda repetitive if LI> the 80-character summary just repeats a shortened version of the long LI> explanation underneath. Exactly. A good haiku will lift the spirit in more than 80 chars :) Ted