From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78298 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: bizarre byte-compile issue, possibly due to EIEIO Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:54:32 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <8762qxo4l3.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87hbahww99.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301705711 25289 80.91.229.12 (2 Apr 2011 00:55:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 00:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 02 02:55:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5p7L-0005TT-3Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 02:55:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37527 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5p7K-0001ed-Le for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36940 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5p7G-0001eO-1a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5p7E-00058b-Qv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:55:01 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:60560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5p7E-00058W-LS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:55:00 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5p75-0005Ml-Ve for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 02:54:51 +0200 Original-Received: from c-67-186-102-106.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([67.186.102.106]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 02:54:51 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-67-186-102-106.hsd1.il.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 02:54:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-67-186-102-106.hsd1.il.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:nhPbZiKrqFgErnAGAqEp/gE/1tc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138047 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78298 Archived-At: On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:29:38 -0500 Ted Zlatanov wrote: TZ> In other words, the registry.elc file is breaking the tests. I can't TZ> figure out what's wrong, but it seems EIEIO-related. If I try to TZ> edebug, that evaluates the problematic methods (e.g. `registry-lookup') TZ> and then they don't exhibit the problem. TZ> Using "(eval-when-compile (require 'registry))" instead of TZ> "(require 'registry)" doesn't help. All the registry.el ERT tests pass. (CC to ding mailing list; see prior messages on emacs-devel for context) I've been able to work around it with: (let ((load-suffixes '(".el"))) (require 'registry)) in gnus-registry.el, but that makes the registry.el functionality really slow and generates this byte-compile warning: In end of data: gnus-registry.el:910:1:Warning: the following functions are not known to be defined: registry-db, eieio-persistent-read, registry-size, registry-prune, eieio-persistent-save, registry-delete, registry-insert, registry-lookup-secondary-value, registry-lookup-secondary, registry-lookup So I hope someone can help me out :) Ted