From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/67634 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: how to speed up connection to a imap server Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:02:38 +0200 Message-ID: <8763nnfs1d.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87ej2bfvb9.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87y70jzguk.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224518982 9563 80.91.229.12 (20 Oct 2008 16:09:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:09:42 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M16085@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Oct 20 18:10:07 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KrsYo-0000If-Ek for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:04:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KrsXO-00048r-Sl; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KrsXN-00048d-Pr for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:03:01 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KrsXK-0001tV-98 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:03:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1KrsXR-0001eF-00 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:03:05 +0200 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1784187fgg.23 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:02:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-mailer:from:to:subject :references:x-hashcash:reply-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=8sDgM+S6SX0laPw50HXAWamoI8G14zigK99tVN8+JPA=; b=G9aWrV8LR2K74N2PFjVENk7VJRMJ+z0iUuMDOOmWLa0x1xwP9x8gbYT2ffGPrYr4V5 CBpLbpRAW8+QPFtShZ3o5Vjdgu9njdttfyRcAcQypXOuZ4bdRkcE7ZEhhpCNnbsw2xzX jUWqj/D3bug9F9ebbpfAPDGtCQO+UY97ok+vo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-mailer:from:to:subject:references:x-hashcash:reply-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=AVPnvMiYs8aDpYaIQv8lQTBd2jsZwFS21tWjV6sZJGUzikJ+rv8MTy+KuJPGs2L78l 9jzjNqj7iOiXQkNQE2CnxRgH41IZ0m7pQt/rDJ6iMG9SpKaKZrP+GWZlBz6hYbUz4Ps8 LrqeecY9mMWYcB1HJL+CghOFZhu9bqQUvXzH0= Original-Received: by 10.86.94.11 with SMTP id r11mr6659660fgb.0.1224500576490; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:02:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from maportatil10 (maportatil12.quim.ucm.es [147.96.6.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm9576693fgg.0.2008.10.20.04.02.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:02:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: 21.4 (patch 19) "Constant Variable" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) X-Hashcash: 1:20:081020:ding@gnus.org::EmW/W1TRg2r3MFMH:00002K6L In-Reply-To: <87y70jzguk.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:44:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:67634 Archived-At: >>>>> "Tassilo" == Tassilo Horn writes: > Uwe Brauer writes: > Hi Uwe, > I think you've already done that implicitly by setting nnimap-stream to > network and thus forbidding encrypted connections. Is that really what > you want? The overhead of encrytion (if there's any) won't make a > difference compared to the normal network latency. Well yes, the 993 port is dead slow :'( > The only thing that will speed up things quite a lot is to install a > local imap server and let gnus connect to it. Syncing between > ucimap.ucm.es and the local server can be done with offlineimap [1], for > example. That is an interesting idea. Have you done it? Which imap server do you recommend? Uwe