From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/61220 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta Subject: Re: Speed difference in Gnus Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:32:22 +0200 Message-ID: <8764rkr5cp.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87r7ap899o.fsf@xemacs.org> <434EFD44.7030601@xemacs.org> <877jcgub0f.fsf@xemacs.org> <434F3897.3050007@xemacs.org> <873bn4tptq.fsf@xemacs.org> <87d5m89wuf.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87y84nyuo0.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <873bmulscb.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87pspypwzv.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87fyqqdfhq.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <85zmoy22o5.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ll0ihqn1.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87ek697ag9.fsf@Jesper-Harders-Computer.local> <85oe5dqmhi.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130319910 17805 80.91.229.2 (26 Oct 2005 09:45:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m9749@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Oct 26 11:45:08 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EUhpK-0001K8-Qh for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:44:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EUhpG-0003nk-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 04:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from nas01.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.39]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1EUhoc-0003nf-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 04:43:26 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas01.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EUhoY-0001Kj-1S for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 04:43:26 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EUhoX-0007Vo-00 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:43:21 +0200 Original-Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EUhmK-0000Jb-32 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:41:04 +0200 Original-Received: from maportatil10.quim.ucm.es ([147.96.7.218]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:41:04 +0200 Original-Received: from oub by maportatil10.quim.ucm.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:41:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: maportatil10.quim.ucm.es X-Hashcash: 1:20:051026:gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta::SYOcwR3yu4JQZjkh:000000000000000000000000000000000000001VL6 X-Hashcash: 1:20:051026:gmane.emacs.gnus.general::CDK6FXkXMnmVV95I:00000000000000000000000000000000000001Y5y User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bGRZw94rDmOcvCq63qBR3vFC/n4= X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61220 gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta:20906 Archived-At: >>>>> "David" == David Kastrup writes: >> >>>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup writes: >>> David> M-x elp-results RET >>> >>> Thanks, this function also exists in xemacs (and I did not know >>> about it), in any case the information is very aehm spare: >> >> You should probably also instrument the `nnml', `imap', `mm' and `mml' >> packages (and maybe some more depending on which operation you're >> benchmarking -- I don't recall). David> And it helps to run the test first before instrumenting it: that way David> not only the autoloads get instrumented. Ok, thanks, I think now more or less I know how to proceed. As I said before the situation is sort of strange: for a certain amount of msg, say n, both emacsen are almost equal, gnu emacs a little faster, once the number of msg > n, then xemacs got stacked. I should add, that the information of the elp packages is detailed the profile-command of xemacs gives far more information. I don't know how important profiling is for emacs, but may that pkg could be ported?