From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/56885 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: asjo@koldfront.dk (=?iso-8859-1?q?Adam_Sj=F8gren?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: CRM114 Mailfilter and spam.el Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:26:46 +0200 Organization: koldfront - analysis & revolution, Copenhagen, Denmark Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <8765cigujt.fsf@virgil.koldfront.dk> References: <87isgjpggh.fsf@virgil.koldfront.dk> <4n65ci5myr.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1080926824 19127 80.91.224.253 (2 Apr 2004 17:27:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5424@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Apr 02 19:26:55 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B9SRS-00064I-00 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:26:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1B9SRI-0001lR-00; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 11:26:44 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1B9SRE-0001lM-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 11:26:40 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B9SRD-00022k-NL for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 11:26:39 -0600 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E033A0043 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:26:38 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B9SR9-0008W4-00 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:26:37 +0200 Original-Received: from 0x50a58d7a.bynxx12.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk ([80.165.141.122]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:26:35 +0200 Original-Received: from asjo by 0x50a58d7a.bynxx12.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:26:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 49 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 0x50a58d7a.bynxx12.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk X-Face: &DfBw60^ZxI8hd?J%t&_8wW?SLF%BBx<2XQ+sXYpX!?{=0C?9D{Nc`;Eq<0d=-L User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:XqoP8m5FmCmDEYvgipn/jYf2kzE= X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56885 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56885 On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 12:06:04 -0500, Ted wrote: > On Thu, 01 Apr 2004, asjo@koldfront.dk wrote: >> So, I've begun to take a stab at switcing from spam-stat.el to >> CRM114 Mailfilter and spam.el. > Great! Just so you know, I plan to add a better way to add backends > to spam.el; something like (spam-add-statistical-backend) for > instance. It's not going to be ready for a while, but it's been on > my mind. Good idea - I've basically copied/search/replaced the bogofilter-parts for now. >> * If a ham is misclassified as spam, and therefore is split into >> nnml:spam, I would like to move it to the correct group and have >> mailfilter.crm called on it with --learnnonspam. > Set a ham-mark (usually the tick mark) on the message. The ham > message, when you quit the group, will be moved to the > ham-process-destination (which can be multiple groups) and processed > with the ham exit processor. This I can't get working (see my previous email with my complete setup described). >> * I would like spam.el *never* to mark *any* message as expirable. > This is hardcoded right now in > spam-mark-spam-as-expired-and-move-routine: > (gnus-summary-mark-article article gnus-expirable-mark) > but it could be changed. Why would you NOT want to expire spam? (I worked around it by having my nnml:spam be unclassified :-)) I want to keep all email I get - if nothing else for statistical purposes. (And if some filter turns out to be really, really good when trained with a billion spam-messages, I'll be ready!) Thanks for the reply, and spam.el :-), Adam --=20 "Mr. Cotton's... parrot. Same question." Adam Sj=F8gren asjo@koldfront.dk