Re: finding the article buffer when splitting

[Alex Schroeder <alex@emacswiki.org>]

Oystein Viggen <oysteivi@tihlde.org> writes:

> In my Gnus, gnus-original-article-buffer seems to always contain the
> last article viewed, and not the one currently spooling.  This makes the
> " *Original Article*" buffer kind of useless for splitting incoming
> mail.

Hm, I think in the summary buffer:

B t runs the command gnus-summary-respool-trace
   which is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `gnus-sum'.

which calls gnus-summary-respool-query
which uses gnus-original-article-buffer.

:)

> I'm currently using Jeremy's defadvice combined with a slightly modified
> spam-stat-split-fancy (set-buffer the-article-buffer instead of
> gnus-original-article-buffer), which sorts correctly but gives a high
> bogus ratio.  (but it works nicely when marking everything in the bogus
> group and respooling)

Hehe.  I got rid of the bogus problem now, so I think you're best of
using my latest copy of spam-stat.el.  I used Jeremy's advice with the
exact same change you listed.  If you just want to adapt that, you
need to change the call (buffer-size) to (- (point-max) (point-min))
-- because buffer-size does not take narrowing into account.  The
resulting numbers caused errors, which resulted in bogus group
splitting.

Alex.
-- 
I will be in Istanbul next week.