From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46442 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Pittman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Time in Redisplay Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 11:25:35 +1000 Organization: Not today, thank you, Mother. Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <8765xg0x9s.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1031534833 24271 127.0.0.1 (9 Sep 2002 01:27:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 01:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17oDKY-0006JG-00 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2002 03:27:11 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17oDJo-00027Z-00; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 20:26:24 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 08 Sep 2002 20:27:01 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA06857 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 20:26:48 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 12780 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2002 01:26:06 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 12775 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2002 01:26:05 -0000 Original-Received: from m029-037.nv.iinet.net.au (HELO melancholia.rimspace.net) (203.217.29.37) by gnus.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 01:26:05 -0000 Original-Received: from localhost (m029-037.nv.iinet.net.au [203.217.29.37]) by melancholia.rimspace.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7242A2A814 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:25:45 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F23A410F11C; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:25:35 +1000 (EST) Original-To: Scott A Crosby In-Reply-To: (Scott A Crosby's message of "08 Sep 2002 03:34:17 -0500") Original-Lines: 42 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo, i686-pc-linux) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46442 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46442 On 08 Sep 2002, Scott A. Crosby wrote: > On 08 Sep 2002 03:29:39 -0500, Scott A Crosby > writes: > >> Hello, I'm using: >> >> XEmacs 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" [Lucid] (i386-debian-linux, Mule) >> of Sat Apr 6 2002 on eeyore Gnus v5.8.8 >> >> I've been using my session > > My apologies.... I was about to comment in the lunacy of this profile: > > Function Name Ticks %/Total Call Count > =============================================== ===== ======= ========== > (in redisplay) 374494 67.116 > (in garbage collection) 51996 9.319 > next-single-property-change 31473 5.641 9569955 > (processing events at top level) 16849 3.020 > string-match 7443 1.334 6500752 > select-frame 7188 1.288 29466166 > ad-Orig-re-search-forward 5997 1.075 2736930 > kill-all-local-variables 5560 0.996 200237 > lazy-lock-fontify-window 3525 0.632 9593636 > get-text-property 3082 0.552 19423541 > > when I noticed I was accidently running MULE. Does non-MULE run > redisplay signifigantly faster? Yes. Well, it does some things faster because it has fixed length character sequences in the buffers, not variable length. This can result in better performance. Daniel -- When there is a gap betweem one's real and one's declared aims, one turns, as it were, instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish squirting out ink. -- George Orwell