p0.88 possible charset bug

p0.88 possible charset bug

[Karl Kleinpaste]

On the xemacs-beta list, steve@xemacs.org posts a note whose headers
include...

        Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
        Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
        Message-ID: <hpzlndjk376.fsf@miho.m17n.org>
        X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 21.2 - =?ISO-2022-JP?B?IhskQktPRUQbKEIi?=

The bulk of his message contains only 7-bit characters, but his
signature contains...

        ^[$BAkHV9f$rF~NO$7$F$/$@$5$$^[(B

Presumably, given Content-Type charset ISO-2022-JP, this signature
sequence should have been rendered in that charset, but it was not --
just the raw crud is displayed.  However, I note that the X-Mailer
contains a legitimate charset sub-encoding, which is properly rendered 
when headers are `t'oggled.

Is this an error on p0.88's part, or does the signature not need
charset treatment?

(I know quite a few folks on the ding list are also on xemacs-beta;
Message-Id is above, so you might take a look yourselves.)

Re: p0.88 possible charset bug

[Didier Verna]

Karl Kleinpaste <karl@justresearch.com> writes:

> Is this an error on p0.88's part, or does the signature not need
> charset treatment?

> (I know quite a few folks on the ding list are also on xemacs-beta;
> Message-Id is above, so you might take a look yourselves.)

        Those messages work well for me with pgnus 0.88 and XEmacs 21.2-b12

-- 
    /     /   _   _       Didier Verna        http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
 - / / - / / /_/ /     ENST, INFRES C201.1       mailto:verna@inf.enst.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ /        46 rue Barrault        Tel.   +33 (1) 45 81 73 46
                       75013 Paris, France      Fax.   +33 (1) 45 81 31 19

Re: p0.88 possible charset bug

[Karl Kleinpaste]

Hm...a difference of appearance varying only with xemacs beta version
disturbs me.  See http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~karl/gnus/pterodactyl/ for
screenshots of how this appears under -b16+p0.88.

Re: p0.88 possible charset bug

[Shenghuo ZHU]

>>>>> "KK" == Karl Kleinpaste <karl@justresearch.com> writes:

KK> Hm...a difference of appearance varying only with xemacs beta version
KK> disturbs me.  See http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~karl/gnus/pterodactyl/ for
KK> screenshots of how this appears under -b16+p0.88.

XEmacs Beta version probably does not setup mule as identically as
XEmacs 20.4. Please check the following expressions

  (featurep 'mule) 
  enable-multibyte-characters

They should be true, at least in function mm-decode-body.

Otherwise, we have to change some conditions in
mm-decode-body/mm-decode-string if it is not a bug in -b16.

-- 
Shenghuo ZHU

Re: p0.88 possible charset bug

[Karl Kleinpaste]

Shenghuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu> writes:
> XEmacs Beta version probably does not setup mule as identically as
> XEmacs 20.4. Please check the following expressions

>   (featurep 'mule) 
>   enable-multibyte-characters

> They should be true, at least in function mm-decode-body.

They're both true everywhere.

(featurep 'mule) => t

`enable-multibyte-characters' is a built-in boolean variable.
Value: t
Documentation:
Emacs Compatible; Unimplemented
Non-nil means the buffer contents are regarded as multi-byte form
of characters, not a binary code.  This affects the display, file I/O,
and behaviors of various editing commands.
Setting this to nil does not do anything.

Re: p0.88 possible charset bug

[Hrvoje Niksic]

Shenghuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu> writes:

> >>>>> "KK" == Karl Kleinpaste <karl@justresearch.com> writes:
> 
> KK> Hm...a difference of appearance varying only with xemacs beta version
> KK> disturbs me.  See http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~karl/gnus/pterodactyl/ for
> KK> screenshots of how this appears under -b16+p0.88.
> 
> XEmacs Beta version probably does not setup mule as identically as
> XEmacs 20.4. Please check the following expressions
> 
>   (featurep 'mule) 
>   enable-multibyte-characters

enable-multibyte-characters has no useful meaning in current XEmacs.

Re: p0.88 possible charset bug

[Shenghuo ZHU]

>>>>> "KK" == Karl Kleinpaste <karl@justresearch.com> writes:

KK> Hm...a difference of appearance varying only with xemacs beta version
KK> disturbs me.  See http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~karl/gnus/pterodactyl/ for
KK> screenshots of how this appears under -b16+p0.88.

Now I upgrade to -b17 (Chiyoda). It works well.

-- 
Shenghuo ZHU